| 000 | 03065cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223032814.0 | ||
| 008 | 210912s2021 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.11.10.M.Sc.2021.Me.F | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aMenatallah Mohamed Ahmed Hassan Omar | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aFace-lifting through high intensity focused ultrasound versus threads : _bA Comparative study / _cMenatallah Mohamed Ahmed Hassan Omar ; Supervised Omar Ahmed Azzam , Mona Mohamed Ibrahim Elkalioby |
| 246 | 1 | 5 |
_aشد الوجه الغير جراحى عن طريق جهاز الموجات الفوق صوتية المكثفة مقابل خيوط الوجه الغير دائمة : _bدراسة مقارنة |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bMenatallah Mohamed Ahmed Hassan Omar , _c2021 |
||
| 300 |
_a170 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Dermatology | ||
| 520 | _aObjective: To compare the efficacy and safety of high intensity focused Ultrasound (HIFU) versus absorbable threads for face lifting. Methods: Twenty females aged from 30 to 60 with moderate facial sagging were randomized into Group A (10 patients) who received a single session of HIFU and Group B (10 patients) who underwent thread procedure. Patients were assessed by a blinded independent investigator after 1 month and 3 months of the procedures. Results:Both HIFU and threads groups showed statistically significant improvement in Merz Aesthetics Scale for jawline after 3 months (p value= 0.003, 0.007 respectively). Although the percent of improvement was higher among threads group compared to HIFU group, the difference wasn{u2019}t significant (p value= 0.349). The improvement was earlier among threads group with statistical significance at 1 month (p value= 0.020), compared to non-statistical significance for HIFU at 1 month (p value= 0.180). There was an associated improvement in the nasolabial fold, marionette lines, submental area, texture and wrinkles with no statistically significant difference between both groups (p value = 0.052, 0.632, 0.952, 0.141, 0.317 respectively). Edema as an adverse effect was statistically more frequent among threads group (p value = 0.016), still patients who underwent threads were significantly more satisfied (p value= 0.020 Among HIFU group, improvement in Merz Aesthetics Scale for jawline showed a negative correlation with baseline Merz Aesthetics Scale for jawline(R= -0.808, P=0.005) moderate facial sagging are better candidates for HIFU than patients with excessive sagging | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aFace anatomy | |
| 653 | 4 | _aFace-lifting | |
| 653 | 4 | _aHigh intensity focused Ultrasound (HIFU) | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aMona Mohamed Ibrahim Elkalioby , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aOmar Ahmed Azzam , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aShimaa _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c82100 _d82100 |
||