000 | 02976cam a2200313 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
008 | 210927s2020 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
041 | 0 | _aeng | |
049 | _aDeposite | ||
097 | _aM.Sc | ||
099 | _aCai01.09.02.M.Sc.2020.No.E | ||
100 | 0 | _aNourhan Ezzat Mohammed | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEffect of M-pro versus proTaper next rotary instrumentation systems on apically extruded debris and canal cleanliness in single canals : _bA comparative in vitro study / _cNourhan Ezzat Mohammed ; Supervised Alaa Aldin Diab , Hany Samy Sadek |
246 | 1 | 5 |
_aدراسه معمليه : _bدراسه تاثير مبرد ام-برو مقارنه بمبرد برو تيبير نكست انظمه الاجهزه الدواره على قذف الحطام من قمم الجذور ونظافه القناه فى القنوات الواحده |
260 |
_aCairo : _bNourhan Ezzat Mohammed , _c2020 |
||
300 |
_a110 P . : _bcharts , facsmilies ; _c25cm |
||
502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Endodontics | ||
520 | _aAim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris and canal cleanliness after canal preparation using M-Pro and ProTaper Next rotary system files. Methodology: Forty extracted human, single-rooted mandibular premolars were divided to two groups (n=20) in each group. The root canal instrumented by G1 ProTaper Next (Dentsply Maillefer, Baillagues, Switzerland) and G2 M-Pro (Guangdong, China, Mainland) according to the manufactures' instructions. Distal water was used as irrigant. The apically extruded debris was collected in preweighted glass vials. The vials were stored in an incubator for 5 days. The vials were weighed to obtain the final dry weight of the extruded debris. The amount of apically extruded debris was calculated by the difference between the weights of the glass vials with dried debris and prewighted of the empty glass vial. Followed by assessment of canal cleanliness irrigation was performed using 2,5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA, followed by rinsing with saline. The roots were split longitudinally into two halves and the canals examined at x2000 and x4000 in Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) the data were statistically analyses. Result: All specimens were associated with apical debris extrusion. No significant difference was noted among the PTN and M-Pro systems (P > 0.05). SEM analysis showed more debris and smear layer removal coronally than in the middle and apically. The mean total debris score and smear layer score between the two groups were no significant difference (P > 0.05) | ||
530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
653 | 4 | _aApical extrusion | |
653 | 4 | _aPTN | |
653 | 4 | _aRotary file system | |
700 | 0 |
_aAlaa Aldin Diab , _eSupervising |
|
700 | 0 |
_aHany Samy Sadek , _eSupervising |
|
905 |
_aAmira _eCataloger |
||
905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
999 |
_c82327 _d82327 |