| 000 | 02999cam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223032827.0 | ||
| 008 | 211013s2021 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aPh.D | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.09.09.Ph.D.2021.Ne.P | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aNermeen Ahmed Hassan Ahmed | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aProsthesis and implant survival in immediately loaded full arch restorations using fiber-reinforced versus non-reinforced temporary frameworks : _bA randomized clinical trial / _cNermeen Ahmed Hassan Ahmed ; Supervised Amal Kaddah , Amr Hosni Elkhadem , Nada Sherin Ahmed |
| 246 | 1 | 5 |
_aتجربة سريرية عشوائية : _bتقييم قدرة التركيبة والغرسات الداعمة لها على البقاء سليمة فى حالات الاستعاضة الكلية المباشرة للفك باستخدام تركيبات مؤقتة مدعمة بالألياف فى مقابل التركيبات الغير مدعمة بأى مقويات إضافية |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bNermeen Ahmed Hassan Ahmed , _c2021 |
||
| 300 |
_a132 P . : _bcharts , facsmilies ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics | ||
| 520 | _aAim: This study was done to evaluate and compare the prosthesis and implant survival in case of temporary fixed complete dentures with fiber reinforced frameworks versus those with non-reinforced frameworks in case of immediately loaded full arch restorations in completely edentulous patients. The associated marginal bone loss in both groups was also reported as well. Methodology: Completely edentulous patients were randomly allocated into two parallel arm groups. Non-reinforced control group (NR) in which patients received non-reinforced all-on-4 immediately loaded fixed restoration and Fiber reinforced group (FR) in which patients received all-on-4 fixed restoration with fiber reinforced framework. Prosthesis and implant survival was clinically evaluated after 4 month follow up period. In addition, digital peri-apical radiographs were taken for the implants using the paralleling technique to evaluate the amount of marginal bone loss in both groups Results: Prosthesis and implant survival was significantly higher in the FR group compared to the NR group. Also, there was a statistically significant decrease in the amount of marginal bone loss associated with the FR group (0.262 ± 0.1 mm) compared to the NR group (0.675 ± 0.22 mm) | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aFiber reinforced frameworks | |
| 653 | 4 | _aNon-reinforced temporary frameworks | |
| 653 | 4 | _aProsthesis and implant survival | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aAmal Kaddah , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aAmr Hosni Elkhadem , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aNada Sherin Ahmed , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aAmira _eCataloger |
||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c82547 _d82547 |
||