000			02951cam a2200337 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223032836.0
008			211026s2021 ua dho f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.21.09.M.Sc.2021.Al.E
100	0		_aAlyaa Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed
245	1	0	_aEffect of open chain versus closed chain segmental control on spinopelvic angles in asymptomatic subjects / _cAlyaa Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed ; Supervised Haytham M. Elhafez , Nabil Mahmoud Ismail
246	1	5	_aتأثير التحكم القطعى للسلسلة المفتوحة مقابل التحكم القطعى للسلسلة المغلقة على الزوايا بين العمود الفقرى و الحوض فى الأشخاص عديمى الأعراض
260			_aCairo : _bAlyaa Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed , _c2021
300			_a80 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles , photoghraphs ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science
520			_aBackground: Maintaining a mechanically efficient posture necessitates proper spine-pelvic alignment. In order to achieve sagittal symmetry, the trunk and pelvis must be aligned with the hip joint. In order to better analyze sagittal equilibrium, it is essential to determine spinal-pelvic parameters, which have been shown to have a close relationship. Pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) are pelvic parameters, whereas lordosis and kyphosis angles are spinal parameters. To measure spinal and pelvic motion, lateral radiography of the spine and pelvis in the standing position is needed. Aim of the study: the study aimed to measure effect of open chain segmental control exercises versus closed chain segmental control exercises on spinopelvic angles in asymptomatic subjects, pre and post application. Subjects and Methods: Twenty eight asymptomatic subjects aged from 18-22 years and body mass index ranged from 19-33kg/m2 were randomly divided into two groups. Group A (n=15) received open chain segmental control exercises for four weeks. Group B (n=13) received closed chain segmental control exercises for four weeks. X-Ray and Corel draw software were used to measure spinopelvic angles (pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope and lumbar lordosis) before and after treatment in both groups. Results: There was an increase in pelvic tilt angle in group "A" while there was an increase in pelvic incidence angle in group "B"
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aClosed chain segmental control
653		4	_aOpen chain segmental control
653		4	_aSpinopelvic angles
700	0		_aHaytham M. Elhafez , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aNabil Mahmoud Ismail , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShimaa _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c82834 _d82834