000 03142cam a2200337 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032839.0
008 211101s2021 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aPh.D
099 _aCai01.21.02.Ph.D.2021.He.E
100 0 _aHeba Yakout Soliman Mohammed Ebadh
245 1 0 _aEffect of extracorporeal shock wave versus pulsed electromagnetic field on diabetic Frozen shoulder in elderly /
_cHeba Yakout Soliman Mohammed Ebadh ; Supervised Awny Fouad Rahmy , Gamal Salah Eldin Elmorsy
246 1 5 _aتأثير الموجات التصادمية الخارجية مقابل الموجات الكهرومغناطيسطية المتقطعة على تيبس الكتف السكرى فى المنسنين
260 _aCairo :
_bHeba Yakout Soliman Mohammed Ebadh ,
_c2021
300 _a127 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Cardiopulmonary and Geriatrics Disorder
520 _aPurpose of the study: This study was conducted to compare between the effect of extracorporeal shock wave and pulsed electromagnetic field in treatment of diabetic frozen shoulder in elderly. Subjects: Sixty elderly male patients with Diabetic frozen shoulder participated and completed the procedure of the study. They were selected from the physical therapy-outpatient clinic of Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital; their ages ranged from 65 to 70 years, the mean values of age in group A and group B were 67.33 ±1.78 and 67.40 ±1.56 year, respectively. Methods: All patients were assessed by standard weight and height scale to measure weight and height for assessing BMI, shoulder pain and disability index to assess pain and disability of shoulder joint, pressure algometer to measure pressure pain threshold, and universal goniometer to measure shoulder joint range of motion (abduction, lateral rotation, and medial rotation).The assessment was made before and after treatment.\They assigned into two groups: Group (A): received Extracorporeal shock wave plus exercise program. Group (B): received Pulsed electromagnetic field plus exercise program. All groups were received 2 sessions weekly for one month, for total of 8 sessions. Results: Comparing both groups post treatment revealed statistically significant increase in abduction, external rotation and internal rotation (P=0.0001; P<0.05) within group A and group B,There were statistically significant decreased in pain scale, disability scale, total shoulder pain and disability index, and pressure algometer (P=0.0001; P<0.05) within group A and group B, In favor of group (A)
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aDiabetic frozen shoulder
653 4 _aExtracorporeal shock wave
653 4 _aPulsed electromagnetic field
700 0 _aAwny Fouad Rahmy ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aGamal Salah Eldin Elmorsy ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aShimaa
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c82907
_d82907