000			03142cam a2200337 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223032839.0
008			211101s2021 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aPh.D
099			_aCai01.21.02.Ph.D.2021.He.E
100	0		_aHeba Yakout Soliman Mohammed Ebadh
245	1	0	_aEffect of extracorporeal shock wave versus pulsed electromagnetic field on diabetic Frozen shoulder in elderly / _cHeba Yakout Soliman Mohammed Ebadh ; Supervised Awny Fouad Rahmy , Gamal Salah Eldin Elmorsy
246	1	5	_aتأثير الموجات التصادمية الخارجية مقابل الموجات الكهرومغناطيسطية المتقطعة على تيبس الكتف السكرى فى المنسنين
260			_aCairo : _bHeba Yakout Soliman Mohammed Ebadh , _c2021
300			_a127 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Cardiopulmonary and Geriatrics Disorder
520			_aPurpose of the study: This study was conducted to compare between the effect of extracorporeal shock wave and pulsed electromagnetic field in treatment of diabetic frozen shoulder in elderly. Subjects: Sixty elderly male patients with Diabetic frozen shoulder participated and completed the procedure of the study. They were selected from the physical therapy-outpatient clinic of Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital; their ages ranged from 65 to 70 years, the mean values of age in group A and group B were 67.33 ±1.78 and 67.40 ±1.56 year, respectively. Methods: All patients were assessed by standard weight and height scale to measure weight and height for assessing BMI, shoulder pain and disability index to assess pain and disability of shoulder joint, pressure algometer to measure pressure pain threshold, and universal goniometer to measure shoulder joint range of motion (abduction, lateral rotation, and medial rotation).The assessment was made before and after treatment.\They assigned into two groups: Group (A): received Extracorporeal shock wave plus exercise program. Group (B): received Pulsed electromagnetic field plus exercise program. All groups were received 2 sessions weekly for one month, for total of 8 sessions. Results: Comparing both groups post treatment revealed statistically significant increase in abduction, external rotation and internal rotation (P=0.0001; P<0.05) within group A and group B,There were statistically significant decreased in pain scale, disability scale, total shoulder pain and disability index, and pressure algometer (P=0.0001; P<0.05) within group A and group B, In favor of group (A)
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aDiabetic frozen shoulder
653		4	_aExtracorporeal shock wave
653		4	_aPulsed electromagnetic field
700	0		_aAwny Fouad Rahmy , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aGamal Salah Eldin Elmorsy , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShimaa _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c82907 _d82907