000 | 03140cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
005 | 20250223032844.0 | ||
008 | 211108s2021 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
041 | 0 | _aeng | |
049 | _aDeposite | ||
097 | _aM.Sc | ||
099 | _aCai01.09.09.M.Sc.2021.Ha.E | ||
100 | 0 | _aHaytham Mohammed Talaat | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEvaluation of retention of partial denture made of injected molded PEEK frameworkversus colbalt chromium framework in mandibular kennedy class I edentulous cases : _bRandomized clinical trail / _cHaytham Mohammed Talaat ; Supervised Amal Fathy Kaddah , Nada Sherin Elkharazaty |
246 | 1 | 5 |
_aفى حالات كنيدى التقسيم الاول cobalt chromium و الثانى من مادة PEEK تقييم الفارق فى قوة الاستبقاء بين نوعين من التركيبات المتحركة الاول مصنع من الصبة المحقونة من مادة : _bدراسة سريرية عشوائية |
260 |
_aCairo : _bHaytham Mohammed Talaat , _c2021 |
||
300 |
_a100 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics | ||
520 | _aAim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the retentive forces of PEEK RPD with PEEK clasps in comparison to Cobalt-Chrome (Co-Cr) RPD with (Co-Cr) clasps during attachment/detachment cycles on abutment teeth in mandibular kennedy class I free end saddle edentulous cases using digital force meter device. Methodology: Mandibular Kennedy class I patients with natural abutments teeth (last standing 2nd premolars) bilaterally were selected for the trial. Abutments of group I Patients were prepared for receiving metal framework removable partial dentures with acrylic teeth and these frameworks were fabricated by conventional casting technique while the abutments of group II patients were prepared to receive PEEK framework removable partial denture with acrylic teeth which were fabricated by injection molding technique. Digital force meter device was used to measure retentive forces of PEEK RPD with peek clasps in comparison to Cobalt-Chrome (Co-Cr) RPD with (Co-Cr) clasps during attachment/detachment cycles. Results: In group I (Control group), there was a statistically significant decrease in retention between 0 month, 1 month and 3 months. For group II (Intervention group) , there was a statistically insignificant difference in retention between 0 month and 1 month, and statistically significant increase in retention between 1 month and 3 months.Comparing the two groups together, there was statistically significant difference between them where Co-Cr RPD offered higher degree of retention in all periods of followup | ||
530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
653 | 4 | _aColbalt chromium | |
653 | 4 | _aKennedy class | |
653 | 4 | _aPEEK | |
700 | 0 |
_aAmal Fathy Kaddah , _eSupervisor |
|
700 | 0 |
_aNada Sherin Elkharazaty , _eSupervisor |
|
856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
905 |
_aShimaa _eCataloger |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
999 |
_c83044 _d83044 |