| 000 | 02918cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223032905.0 | ||
| 008 | 211227s2021 ua dho f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aPh.D | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.21.09.Ph.D.2021.He.M | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aHeba Allah Samy Said Ahmed | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides versus thoracic manipulation on mechanical neck pain : _bA randomized controlled study / _cHeba Allah Samy Said Ahmed ; Supervised Maher Ahmed Elkeblawy , Nabil Mahmoud Ismail |
| 246 | 1 | 5 |
_aتحريك موليجان النتوئى المفصلى الطبيعى المستمر مقابل التحريك الصدرى على ألم الرقبة الميكانيكى : _bدراسة عشوائية محكمة |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bHeba Allah Samy Said Ahmed , _c2021 |
||
| 300 |
_a124 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles , photoghraphs ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science | ||
| 520 | _aObjective: To investigate the adding effects of Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) versus thoracic manipulation (TM) to conventional physical therapy (CPT) on pain, neck range of motion (ROM) and functional activities in subjects with mechanical neck pain (MNP). Design: Pretest- posttest Randomized controlled study. Setting: Department of physical therapy, Ain Shams university hospital.Participants: Sixty patients with MNP were assigned randomly into 3 equal groups with no significant differences among groups regarding age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI) and gender. Intervention: Mulligan SNAGs and CPT (group I), TM plus CPT (group II), and CPT only (group III). All participants received 3 sessions per week for four weeks. Outcome Measures: Pain intensity, pressure pain threshold (PPT), Neck ROM, and disability were measured at baseline, after 4 weeks and then after1 month with no intervention. Results: After 4 weeks of intervention, group I showed superiority to group II and III in all measured outcomes (P<0.05) except for flexion and extension ROM (P>0.05). Group II showed superiority to group III in all measured outcomes (P<0.05) except for flexion ROM and neck disability index (NDI) (P>0.05). After one-month follow-up, group I showed superiority to group II and III in all measured outcomes (P<0.05) except for extension ROM (P>0.05).Group II showed superiority to group III in all measured outcomes (P<0.05) | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aMechanical neck pain | |
| 653 | 4 | _aMulligan SNAGs | |
| 653 | 4 | _aThoracic manipulation | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aMaher Ahmed Elkeblawy , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aNabil Mahmoud Ismail , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aShimaa _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c83736 _d83736 |
||