000			02888cam a2200337 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
008			220213s2021 ua dho f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aPh.D
099			_aCai01.21.09.Ph.D.2021.Ze.I
100	0		_aZeinab Salah Eldein Mohamed Abdelaziz
245	1	0	_aInstrument assisted soft tissue mobilization versus myofascial release on mechanical neck pain / _cZeinab Salah Eldein Mohamed Abdelaziz ; Supervised Neveen Abdellatif Abdelraoof , Mohamed Serag Eldein Mahgoub , Mohamed Rabeea Abdallah
246	1	5	_aجهاز مساعدة الانسجة الرخوة مقابل الافراج الليفى العضلى على ألام الرقبة الميكانيكية
260			_aCairo : _bZeinab Salah Eldein Mohamed Abdelaziz , _c2021
300			_a98 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles , photoghraphs ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science
520			_aBackground:Mechanical neck pain commonly arises insidiously and is generally multifactorial in origin, including one or more of the following: poor posture, anxiety, depression, neck strain Purpose: To compare the efficacy of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) versus myofascial release on patients with mechanical neck pain. Methods: Forty-five ( 20 male and 25 female) patients aged 25 to 40 years were randomly assigned into 3 equal groups. Each group consistsed of 15 patients. Group (A) received Garston technique plus a selected physical therapy treatment. Group (B) received myofascial release plus a selected physical therapy treatment. Group (C) received the selected physical therapy treatment only. They were evaluated pre and post-treatment for neck pain severity by the visual analogue scale, functional ability using neck disability index, range of motion using an inclinometer, and tenderness by pressure algometer. Results: There was a significant difference post-treatment between instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and myofascial release. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and myofascial release were more effective than the control group in relieving pain,improve functional disability, and increase range of motion, with greater improvement in instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization group compared with myofascial release group
530			_aIssued also as CD
650		0	_a Instrument
653		4	_aInstrument assisted soft tissue mobilization--
653		4	_aMechanical neck pain
653		4	_aMyofascial release
700	0		_aMohamed Rabeea Abdallah , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aMohamed Serag Eldein Mahgoub , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aNeveen Abdellatif Abdelraoof , _eSupervisor
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShimaa _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c84197 _d84197