000			02271nam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223032933.0
008			220725s2021 ua dho f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.09.09.M.Sc.2021.Ha.I
100	0		_aHassan Alaa Diab
245	1	0	_a Implant stability in laser treated surface vs sla treated short implants: _bRandomized clinical trial / _cHassan Alaa Diab Supervised Mohamed Labib Zamzam
246	1	5	_aثبات غرسات الأسنان ذات الطول القصير في السطح المعالج بالليزر مقارنةً بالسطح المعالج بسفح الرمل والتخريش الحمضي: _bتجربة سريرية عشوائية
260			_aCairo : _bHassan Alaa Diab , _c2021
300			_a110p. : _bcharts, facsimiles, photographes ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Dentistry - Department of Fixed Prosthodontics
520			_aAim: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of laser treatment of implant surface in enhancing the implant primary stability and fastening the process of osseointegration. Methodology: 16 Implants were placed in 7 patients divided into two groups, each group had 8 implants of the laser treated type the other group was 8 implants of the SLA treated implant. The stability of these implants was measured using RFA measuring device immediately at time of insertion and after 2,4,6,8 and 12 weeks. Conclusion: laser treated surface implants have shown a higher stability during healing phase when compared to the SLA treated surface implants, but at 12 weeks, both groups reach the same stability with no statistical difference. The SLA exhibit a stability dip in early healing period weeks 2 to 4 more than the dip seen in laser treated implants
530			_aIssued also as CD
650		0	_aStability
653			_aImplant stability
653			_alaser treated surface
653			_aTreated short implants
700	0		_aMohamed Labib Zamzam , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aReham El Basty, _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aSamah _eCataloger
905			_eRevisor
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c84651 _d84651