000			03233nam a2200361 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223032938.0
008			220925s2022 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.21.02.M.Sc.2022.Om.E
100	0		_aOmnia Ahmed Khalaf Ismail
245	1	0	_aEffect Of Threshold Inspiratory Trainer Versus Trigger Sensitivity Adjustment On Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation / _c Omnia Ahmed Khalaf Ismail ; Supervised Nessrin Ghareeb Elnahass , Heba Ahmed Ali Abdeen , Youssef Mohamed Amin Soliman
246	1	5	_aتأثير مدرب عضلات الشهيق مقابل تعديل حساسيه صمام الشهيق لجهاز التنفس الصناعي على فصل المرضى من جهاز التنفس الصناعي
260			_aCharts : _bOmnia Ahmed Khalaf Ismail , _c2022
300			_a100 P . : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of physical therapy - Department of
520			_aPurpose: This study was conducted to compare between the effects of using threshold inspiratory muscles trainer (IMT) devices versus adjustment of the mechanical ventilator (MV) trigger sensitivity on weaning patient from mechanical ventilation. Methods Ninety patients from both sexes, with acute respiratory failure, intubated and mechanically ventilated. Their ages ranged from 50 to 70 years. They were selected from Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Department of Chest Diseases, Cairo University Hospitals. They were randomly assigned into three equal groups. Group (A): included thirty patients who were trained by threshold IMT device plus routine physical therapy. Group (B): included thirty patients who were trained by adjusting (MV) trigger sensitivity plus routine physical therapy. Group (C): included thirty patients who were received only routine physical therapy. (Negative inspiratory force NIF, arterial blood gases, Horowitz index (P/F ration), respiratory rate RR, tidal volume TV, and rapid shallow breathing index RSBI) were measured before the study and at the end of the study (just before weaning for successfully weaned patients, or on the 10th day of intervention for failed weaning patients). Results: Comparison between group (A) and (B) showed a significant improvement in (NIF and RSBI) with preference to group (A), other measurements showed no significant difference. Comparison between group (A) and (C) showed a significant improvement in all measurements except (PH and PaCO2) with preference to group (A). Comparison between group (B) and (C) showed a significant improvement in all measurements except (TV, PH and PaCO2) with preference to group (B).
530			_aIssued also as CD
650		0	_aMechanical Ventilation
653			_ainspiratory muscle training
653			_aIntensive care unit
653			_aRespiratory Failure
700	0		_aHeba Ahmed Ali Abdeen , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aNessrin Ghareeb Elnahass , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aYoussef Mohamed Amin Soliman , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aAmira _eCataloger
905			_eRevisor
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c84830 _d84830