صورة الغلاف المحلية
صورة الغلاف المحلية
صور من OpenLibrary

Lifespan of three single file nickel-titanium rotary systems in simulated curved canals / Mina Aziz Abdou Shenouda ; Supervised Siza Yacoub Zakhari , Wafaa Ahmed Omar Segari

بواسطة: المساهم: نوع المادة : نصاللغة: الإنجليزية تفاصيل النشر: Cairo : Mina Aziz Abdou Shenouda , 2016الوصف: 82 P. : photographs ; 25cmعنوان آخر:
  • عمر ثلاثة من أنظمة النيكل تيتانيوم الدوارة ذات المبرد الواحد باستخدام القنوات المنحنية المحاكية [عنوان مضاف عنوان الصفحة]
الموضوع: موارد على الإنترنت: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
ملاحظة الأطروحة: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Endodontics ملخص: The purpose of the present study was to compare the lifespan and deformation of three single file nickel titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper F2, wave one primary and one shape when used in simulated curved canals. A total of fifteen defect-free instruments were divided into three equal groups according to the instruments' type. The selected instruments were used to prepare simulated canals embedded in resin blocks, which had a 45 o angle and a 6 mm radius of curvature. Both ProTaper F2 and wave one primary files were activated in a reciprocation motion using angles of reciprocation of 150o CW/30 o CCW and 150 o CCW/30 o CW respectively; whereas, the One Shape files were used in a continuous rotation. Each instrument was repeatedly used till the incidence of fracture, and the mean lifespan was determined for each group. Naked eye inspection and stereomicroscope examination were performed to examine the instruments for defects following each canal preparation, where the incidence, type, and progress of deformation for each instrument were recorded. Also, the canal preparation time was determined, and the mean time for canal preparation for each group was calculated. The ProTaper F2 and wave one primary instruments showed no significant difference in the mean lifespan, whereas, one shape instrument had a significantly longer lifespan. There was no significant difference between ProTaper F2 and wave one primary instruments regarding the incidence of cracks, while One Shape instrument showed a significantly delayed incidence of cracks in comparison to both instruments
وسوم من هذه المكتبة: لا توجد وسوم لهذا العنوان في هذه المكتبة. قم بتسجيل الدخول لإضافة الوسوم.
التقييم باستخدام النجوم
    متوسط التقييم: 0.0 (0 صوتًا)
المقتنيات
نوع المادة المكتبة الحالية المكتبة الرئيسية رقم الاستدعاء رقم النسخة حالة الباركود
Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2016.Mi.L (استعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) لا تعار 01010110071290000
CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.02.M.Sc.2016.Mi.L (استعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) 71290.CD لا تعار 01020110071290000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Endodontics

The purpose of the present study was to compare the lifespan and deformation of three single file nickel titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper F2, wave one primary and one shape when used in simulated curved canals. A total of fifteen defect-free instruments were divided into three equal groups according to the instruments' type. The selected instruments were used to prepare simulated canals embedded in resin blocks, which had a 45 o angle and a 6 mm radius of curvature. Both ProTaper F2 and wave one primary files were activated in a reciprocation motion using angles of reciprocation of 150o CW/30 o CCW and 150 o CCW/30 o CW respectively; whereas, the One Shape files were used in a continuous rotation. Each instrument was repeatedly used till the incidence of fracture, and the mean lifespan was determined for each group. Naked eye inspection and stereomicroscope examination were performed to examine the instruments for defects following each canal preparation, where the incidence, type, and progress of deformation for each instrument were recorded. Also, the canal preparation time was determined, and the mean time for canal preparation for each group was calculated. The ProTaper F2 and wave one primary instruments showed no significant difference in the mean lifespan, whereas, one shape instrument had a significantly longer lifespan. There was no significant difference between ProTaper F2 and wave one primary instruments regarding the incidence of cracks, while One Shape instrument showed a significantly delayed incidence of cracks in comparison to both instruments

Issued also as CD

لا توجد تعليقات على هذا العنوان.

اضغط على الصورة لمشاهدتها في عارض الصور

صورة الغلاف المحلية
شارك
Cairo University Libraries Portal Implemented & Customized by: Eng. M. Mohamady Contacts: new-lib@cl.cu.edu.eg | cnul@cl.cu.edu.eg
CUCL logo CNUL logo
© All rights reserved — Cairo University Libraries
CUCL logo
Implemented & Customized by: Eng. M. Mohamady Contact: new-lib@cl.cu.edu.eg © All rights reserved — New Central Library
CNUL logo
Implemented & Customized by: Eng. M. Mohamady Contact: cnul@cl.cu.edu.eg © All rights reserved — Cairo National University Library