Immunohistochemical study of ezrin expression in colorectal carcinoma / Yousra Ossama Kamal Eldin ; Supervised Ali Ahmed Foad Elhindawi , Essam Ezzat Ayad , Mona Salah Eldin Abdelmagid
Material type:
- دراسة مناعية هستوكيميائية للتعبير عن الإزرين فى سرطان القولون [Added title page title]
- Issued also as CD
Item type | Current library | Home library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.11.27.Ph.D.2018.Yo.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan | 01010110078119000 | ||
![]() |
مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.11.27.Ph.D.2018.Yo.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 78119.CD | Not for loan | 01020110078119000 |
Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Pathology
Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Ezrin is involved in maintaining cell structure and cell motility. Expression levels of the ezrin gene correlate with numerous human malignancies. Aim of this work: to determine the significance of ezrin in the development and progression of colorectal carcinoma to provide the evidence for clinical prognosis and suitable adjuvant therapy. Material & Methods: Ezrin expression was evaluated in fifty one cases of colorectal carcinoma by using two methods; objective and quantitative method to determine the statistical relation between ezrin objective analysis score and clinicopathological parameters and to do a comparative study between both methods of analysis. Results: Ezrin was expressed in 92.2% of cases, and it showed a statistical significant relation with tumor grade.There was no statistical relationship between ezrin expression and different clinicopathological findings. A statistically significant relation was found between ezrin objective analysis score and ezrin quantitative analysis score (P-value <0.05). A strong positive Pearson correlation exists between both methods of analysis (R=0.868)
Issued also as CD
There are no comments on this title.