صورة الغلاف المحلية
صورة الغلاف المحلية
صور من OpenLibrary

Ridge Augmentaion Using Autologous Concentrated Growth Factors (Cgf) Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) Versus Guided Bone Regeneration Usnig Native Collagen Membrane In Horizontally Deficient Maxilla : by Sarah Abdallah Mohamed Aboelala ; Supervised Prof.Dr. Hisham Fattouh , Prof.Dr. Mohamed Atef Randomized Clinical Trial /

بواسطة: المساهم: نوع المادة : نصاللغة: الإنجليزية لغة الملخص: الإنجليزية, العربية المنتج: 2020الوصف: 118 P : bcharts , photographs ; 25cm+ CDنوع المحتوى:
  • text
نوع الوسائط:
  • Unmediated
نوع الناقل:
  • volume
عنوان آخر:
  • الدعم العظمي باستخدام الطعم العظمي مضافا اليه عوامل النموالمركزه الذاتيه )الطعم العظمي المتماسك( مقارنه باعاده تكوين العظم الموجه باستخدام غشاء الكولاجين في المناطق الضامره افقيا في الفك العلوي تجربة سريرية عشوائية [عنوان مضاف عنوان الصفحة]
الموضوع: تصنيف ديوي العشري:
  • 610
Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
ملاحظة الأطروحة: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Dentistry - Department of Oral Implantology. ملخص: Aim: The aim of the study is radiographic assessment of bone gain using autologous concentrated growth factors (CGF) enriched bone graft matrix (sticky bone) versus guided bone regeneration using native collagen membrane for horizontally deficient maxilla. Methodology: A total of 28 patients presenting with Len Class IV ridge classification (2- 4mm residual alveolar width) were included in the study. 14 patients received horizontal augmentation using sticky bone prepared from a 1:1 mixture of autogenous and anorganic bovine bone minerals covered by a concentrated growth factors (CGF) membrane. The other 14 patients received horizontal augmentation using guided bone regeneration by a mixture of 1:1 autogenous and anorganic bovine bone minerals covered by a native collagen membrane (sausage technique). CBCT scans were taken immediately postoperative and after 6 months to measure the horizontal bone gain in both groups. Results: For native collagen group, the median horizontal gain measured at 2, 5 and 10 mm from the alveolar crest was 2.55 with range (1.43 ,4.34) mm, 2.61 with range (0.02 ,4.71) mm and 1.15 with range (-2.88 ,4.89) mm, respectively. While for CGF group, the median horizontal gain measured at 2, 5 and 10 mm from the alveolar crest was 1.54 with range (-0,97, 2.93) mm, 2.8with range (-2.01, 5.27) mm, 2.97 with range (-1.32, 5.4) mm, respectively. Mean horizontal bone width was statistically significant within each group, and comparing both groups the difference was also statistically significant. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, horizontal ridge augmentation using sticky bone covered by CGF membrane is a simple technique with unpredictable results compared to guided bone regeneration using native collagen membrane
وسوم من هذه المكتبة: لا توجد وسوم لهذا العنوان في هذه المكتبة. قم بتسجيل الدخول لإضافة الوسوم.
التقييم باستخدام النجوم
    متوسط التقييم: 0.0 (0 صوتًا)
المقتنيات
نوع المادة المكتبة الحالية المكتبة الرئيسية رقم الاستدعاء رقم النسخة حالة الباركود
Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2020.Sa.R (استعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) لا تعار 01010110085567000
CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai.09.13.M.Sc.2020.Sa.R (استعراض الرف(يفتح أدناه)) 85567.CD لا تعار 01020110085567000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Dentistry - Department of Oral Implantology.

Bibliography: Pages 122-131.

Aim: The aim of the study is radiographic assessment of bone gain using autologous concentrated growth factors (CGF) enriched bone graft matrix (sticky bone) versus guided bone regeneration using native collagen membrane for horizontally deficient maxilla. Methodology: A total of 28 patients presenting with Len Class IV ridge classification (2- 4mm residual alveolar width) were included in the study. 14 patients received horizontal augmentation using sticky bone prepared from a 1:1 mixture of autogenous and anorganic bovine bone minerals covered by a concentrated growth factors (CGF) membrane. The other 14 patients received horizontal augmentation using guided bone regeneration by a mixture of 1:1 autogenous and anorganic bovine bone minerals covered by a native collagen membrane (sausage technique). CBCT scans were taken immediately postoperative and after 6 months to measure the horizontal bone gain in both groups. Results: For native collagen group, the median horizontal gain measured at 2, 5 and 10 mm from the alveolar crest was 2.55 with range (1.43 ,4.34) mm, 2.61 with range (0.02 ,4.71) mm and 1.15 with range (-2.88 ,4.89) mm, respectively. While for CGF group, the median horizontal gain measured at 2, 5 and 10 mm from the alveolar crest was 1.54 with range (-0,97, 2.93) mm, 2.8with range (-2.01, 5.27) mm, 2.97 with range (-1.32, 5.4) mm, respectively. Mean horizontal bone width was statistically significant within each group, and comparing both groups the difference was also statistically significant. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, horizontal ridge augmentation using sticky bone covered by CGF membrane is a simple technique with unpredictable results compared to guided bone regeneration using native collagen membrane

Issued also as CD

Text in English and abstract in Arabic & English.

لا توجد تعليقات على هذا العنوان.

اضغط على الصورة لمشاهدتها في عارض الصور

صورة الغلاف المحلية
شارك
Cairo University Libraries Portal Implemented & Customized by: Eng. M. Mohamady Contacts: new-lib@cl.cu.edu.eg | cnul@cl.cu.edu.eg
CUCL logo CNUL logo
© All rights reserved — Cairo University Libraries
CUCL logo
Implemented & Customized by: Eng. M. Mohamady Contact: new-lib@cl.cu.edu.eg © All rights reserved — New Central Library
CNUL logo
Implemented & Customized by: Eng. M. Mohamady Contact: cnul@cl.cu.edu.eg © All rights reserved — Cairo National University Library