Comparative study between socket shield technique versus allograft buccal sheet technique on alveolar bone resorption after immediate implant placement in esthetic region : A randomized clinical trial / by Aya Hatem Rafaat ; Supervisors Prof. Mohamed Ahmed Farid Shehab, Assoc. Mohammed ABD ElSalam Omara.

By:

Aya Hatem Rafaat [preparation.]

Contributor(s):

Material type:

TextLanguage: English Summary language: English, Arabic Producer: 2024Description: 98 pages : illustrations ; 25 cm. + CDContent type:

text

Media type:

Unmediated

Carrier type:

volume

Other title:

دراسة مقارنة بين تقنية درع التجويف مقابل تقنية طعما لعظام الصناعى على ارتشاف العظم السنخى بعد وضع الزرع الفورى فى المنطقة التجميلية : التجارب السريريه العشوائيه [Added title page title]

Subject(s):

DDC classification:

617.605

Available additional physical forms:

Issues also as CD.

Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc)-Cairo University, 2024. Summary: Aim: This study aimed to compare the effect of socket shield technique versus allograft buccal sheet technique in buccal bone resorption after immediate implant placement in esthetic region. Methodology: This randomized clinical study included 22 patients, with upper anterior remaining root indicated for immediate dental implant. Group (1) included 11 patients who treated with immediate dental implant with socket shield technique (control group), and group (2) (study group), included 11patients in which immediate dental implant utilizing buccal sheet technique. In both groups, Bone height and width were radiographically analyzed and carefully reported pre, immediate, and 4 months post-operative, Moreover, A pink esthetic score was recorded and statistically evaluated 4-month post-operative. Results: Both groups showed bone resorption 4 months postoperative. The decrease in bone width and height in control group was higher than the study group However, this difference was statistically non-significant with p-value (p>0.05). Regarding the pink esthetic score:. There is no statistically significant difference between the control group and the Study Group, with p-value (p>0.05) however the socket shield shows more satisfied results. Conclusion: Socket shield technique and allogenic buccal sheet techniques can prevent the resorption of buccal cortical plate of bone around the immediate dental implant. With no significant difference in bone loss between the two groups. However, using socket shield technique enhanced the soft tissue healing, more economic for patients and more comfortable for the patient. While utilizing buccal sheet technique enhance osteointegration, less technique sensitive and without donor site. Summary: تم اجراء هذه التجربة السريرية العشوائية علي عدد اثنين و عشرين مشارك بالغ ممن يعانون من وجود جذور أسنان أمامية بالفك العلوي التي لا تصلح للأعادة البناء و تحتاج لعمل زراعة الاسنان الفورية . تم تقسيم هؤلاء المشاركين بشكل عشوائي إلى مجموعتين: المجموعة الاولي تتضمن احدي عشر مشاركا ,يتم وضع الزرعات الفورية مع استخدام تقنية درع التجويف النسخي . و المجموعة الثانية : تتضمن احدي عشر مشاركا , يتم وضع الزرعات الفورية مع استخدام تقنية طعم العظام . تم ملاحظة ومقارنة قياسات العضم في ثلاث فترات وهي قبل زراعة الاسنان ,بعد الزراعة مباشرة و بعد المتابعة بأربعة اشهر . وتظهر الدراسة فقدان العظام في كلا المجموعتين ولكن بفروق ضئيلة بين المجموعتين ..

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Home library	Call number	Status	Barcode
Thesis	قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول	المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة	Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2024.Ay.C (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Not for loan	01010110092096000

Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2023.Ol.A. Assessment of Stability and Marginal Bone Loss of Early Loaded Nano Coated Hydroxyapatite Implants in Posterior Maxilla: a pilot study/	Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2023.Sh.S. Stability of two different designs of patient specific osteosynthesis “one piece vs two piece” for the fixation of lefort 1 osteotomy in maxillary orthognathic surgery : A randomized clinical trial /	Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2024.Ah.A. Adequacy of one –point fixation of displaced zygomatic complex fractures using customized plate : Pre-post study /	Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2024.Ay.C Comparative study between socket shield technique versus allograft buccal sheet technique on alveolar bone resorption after immediate implant placement in esthetic region : A randomized clinical trial /	Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2024.Ba.G Graftless closed sinus tenting using dental implants after densah bur osteotomy versus conventional osteotome in localized sinus pneumatization : a randomized clinical trial /	Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2024.Da.P Peri-implant stress distribution in maxillary all-on-4 prostheses fabricated on multi-unit angled abutments with cobalt chromium framework versus those with titanium frame : A 3D Finite Element Analysis /	Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2024.Ho.E. Effect of sodium alendronate versus sticky bone as socket preservation materials on the final implant stability : A randomized clinical trial /	Next

Thesis (M.Sc)-Cairo University, 2024.

Bibliography: pages 92-96.

Aim: This study aimed to compare the effect of socket shield technique versus allograft buccal sheet technique in buccal bone resorption after immediate implant placement in esthetic region.
Methodology: This randomized clinical study included 22 patients, with upper anterior remaining root indicated for immediate dental implant. Group (1) included 11 patients who treated with immediate dental implant with socket shield technique (control group), and group (2) (study group), included 11patients in which immediate dental implant utilizing buccal sheet technique. In both groups, Bone height and width were radiographically analyzed and carefully reported pre, immediate, and 4 months post-operative, Moreover, A pink esthetic score was recorded and statistically evaluated 4-month post-operative.
Results: Both groups showed bone resorption 4 months postoperative. The decrease in bone width and height in control group was higher than the study group However, this difference was statistically non-significant with p-value (p>0.05). Regarding the pink esthetic score:. There is no statistically significant difference between the control group and the Study Group, with p-value (p>0.05) however the socket shield shows more satisfied results.
Conclusion: Socket shield technique and allogenic buccal sheet techniques can prevent the resorption of buccal cortical plate of bone around the immediate dental implant. With no significant difference in bone loss between the two groups. However, using socket shield technique enhanced the soft tissue healing, more economic for patients and more comfortable for the patient. While utilizing buccal sheet technique enhance osteointegration, less technique sensitive and without donor site.

تم اجراء هذه التجربة السريرية العشوائية علي عدد اثنين و عشرين مشارك بالغ ممن يعانون من وجود جذور أسنان أمامية بالفك العلوي التي لا تصلح للأعادة البناء و تحتاج لعمل زراعة الاسنان الفورية .
تم تقسيم هؤلاء المشاركين بشكل عشوائي إلى مجموعتين: المجموعة الاولي تتضمن احدي عشر مشاركا ,يتم وضع الزرعات الفورية مع استخدام تقنية درع التجويف النسخي . و المجموعة الثانية : تتضمن احدي عشر مشاركا , يتم وضع الزرعات الفورية مع استخدام تقنية طعم العظام .
تم ملاحظة ومقارنة قياسات العضم في ثلاث فترات وهي قبل زراعة الاسنان ,بعد الزراعة مباشرة و بعد المتابعة بأربعة اشهر .
وتظهر الدراسة فقدان العظام في كلا المجموعتين ولكن بفروق ضئيلة بين المجموعتين ..

Issues also as CD.

Text in English and abstract in Arabic & English.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

جامعة القاهرة

المكتبة المركزية الجديدة

مكتبة جامعة القاهرة الأهلية

Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)