header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Clinical evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite versus flowable composite in conservative class I cavities : Randomized controlled trial / Omar Osama Shaalan ; Supervised Amira Farid Elzoghby , Eman Abouauf

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Omar Osama Shaalan , 2018Description: 62 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • تقييم سريري للكمبوزيت ذاتي اللصق القابل للتسييل في مقابل الكمبوزيت القابل للتسييل في الحفرات السنية المحافظة من الصنف الاول : تجربة عشوائية مضبوطة [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Operative Dentistry Summary: Background: Self adhering flowable composite (SAFC) minimized the time consuming application procedures encountered with the traditional adhesive systems and restorative materials.Self adhering composite combines the merits of both adhesive and restorative material technologies (8th generation) in a single product, bringing new horizons, and ambitions to restorative procedures. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of SAFC compared to conventional flowable composite in conservative Class I cavities. Materials andMethods: In a split mouth design, after cavity preparation, 18 patients with conservative Class I cavities received randomly two pairs of restorations, either Vertise{u2122} flow or Filtek{u2122} Z350 XT Flowable combined with Scotchbond{u2122} Universal Etchant and Single Bond Universal, all materials were applied according to the manufacturer{u2019}s instructions. Restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months by two calibrated assessors using the modified United States Public Health Service criteria measuring (retention, postoperative hypersensitivity, color match, marginal adaptation, and marginal discoloration).Statistical Analysis: Chi square test was used to compare between flowable composite materials after different follow up periods, Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to explore changes over follow up periods. A value of P {u2264} 0.05wasconsideredstatistically significant.Results: At baseline and 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference between both materials for all tested outcomes
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2018.Om.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110077986000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2018.Om.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 77986.CD Not for loan 01020110077986000

Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
No cover image available
Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2018.Ma.O One-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill resin composite using FDI criteria in comparison to conventional incremental posterior restoration / Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2018.Mo.C Clinical assessment of deep carious lesions after partial removal of caries vs stepwise excavation : A randomized controlled trial / Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2018.Mo.C Clinical assessment of deep carious lesions after partial removal of caries vs stepwise excavation : A randomized controlled trial / Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2018.Om.C Clinical evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite versus flowable composite in conservative class I cavities : Randomized controlled trial / Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2018.Om.C Clinical evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite versus flowable composite in conservative class I cavities : Randomized controlled trial / Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2018.Om.C Clinical and radiographical evaluation of new bioactive dentine substitute (Biodentine) versus glass ionomer cement in treatment of very deep carious lesions : Randomized clinical trial / Cai01.09.03.Ph.D.2018.Om.C Clinical and radiographical evaluation of new bioactive dentine substitute (Biodentine) versus glass ionomer cement in treatment of very deep carious lesions : Randomized clinical trial /

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Operative Dentistry

Background: Self adhering flowable composite (SAFC) minimized the time consuming application procedures encountered with the traditional adhesive systems and restorative materials.Self adhering composite combines the merits of both adhesive and restorative material technologies (8th generation) in a single product, bringing new horizons, and ambitions to restorative procedures. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of SAFC compared to conventional flowable composite in conservative Class I cavities. Materials andMethods: In a split mouth design, after cavity preparation, 18 patients with conservative Class I cavities received randomly two pairs of restorations, either Vertise{u2122} flow or Filtek{u2122} Z350 XT Flowable combined with Scotchbond{u2122} Universal Etchant and Single Bond Universal, all materials were applied according to the manufacturer{u2019}s instructions. Restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months by two calibrated assessors using the modified United States Public Health Service criteria measuring (retention, postoperative hypersensitivity, color match, marginal adaptation, and marginal discoloration).Statistical Analysis: Chi square test was used to compare between flowable composite materials after different follow up periods, Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to explore changes over follow up periods. A value of P {u2264} 0.05wasconsideredstatistically significant.Results: At baseline and 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference between both materials for all tested outcomes

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image
Share
Under the supervision of New Central Library Manager

Implemented and Customized by: Eng.M.Mohamady
Contact:   info@cl.cu.edu.eg

© All rights reserved  New Central Library