Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Impact of wastewater treatment plants on the quality of groundwater in some areas in Egypt / Alaa Mohamed Ahmed Mahmoud ; Supervised Mary Sobhy Khalil , Youssry Elsayed Ahmed , Ayman Youssef Ibrahim

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Alaa Mohamed Ahmed Mahmoud , 2021Description: 106 P. : charts ; 25cmOther title:
  • تأثير محطات معالجة مياه الصرف الصحى على نوعية المياه الجوفية فى بعض المناطق فى مصر [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Science - Department of Botany - Microbiology Summary: Municipal sewage, septic tanks, fertilizers, animal feedlots and irrigation wastewater are the common sources of groundwater pollution in rural areas. Sedimentation pools of wastewater treatment plants are possibly suggested to be another source of pollution. Two wastewater treatment plants located at Qalyubia Governorate named Qalyub (QWTP) and Shubra Al-khayma (SHWTP) were selected to carry out the present study; two samples from influent and effluent were collected seasonally from both plants. Furthermore, 6 groundwater samples were collected from nearby rural houses of both plants. The physicochemical and microbiological properties were evaluated for all samples. Moreover, BOX-PCR for 12 strains isolated from wastewater and groundwater at Qalyub district was carried out. Water quality assessment studies and field observations proved that the seasonal variations had no impact on all sampling sites but 2point source contamination3. The effectiveness of the two wastewater treatment plants under investigation is questionable, especially QWTP. The percentages of removing of TSS, COD, BOD, ammonia, total coliform and faecal coliform counts were 87, 74, 88, 66, 94 and 89%, respectively, for QWTP, and 85, 89, 93, 86, 94 and 83%, respectively, for SHWTP.The groundwater at Qalyub district was contaminated with Mn, Fe, ammonia, BOD, coliform bacteria, faecalstreptococci, E.coli, Aeromonashydrophila and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, while the groundwater at Shubra Al-khayma district was contaminated with Mn, coliform bacteria, faecalstreptococci and P. aeruginosa. Microbial and chemical evaluation of groundwater, as well as, BOX-PCR results confirmed that water treatment plants have no negative impact on the quality of shallow groundwater. To purify the contaminated groundwater with bacteria, a designed filter was suggested
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.12.05.M.Sc.2021.Al.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110084534000
CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.12.05.M.Sc.2021.Al.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 84534.CD Not for loan 01020110084534000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Science - Department of Botany - Microbiology

Municipal sewage, septic tanks, fertilizers, animal feedlots and irrigation wastewater are the common sources of groundwater pollution in rural areas. Sedimentation pools of wastewater treatment plants are possibly suggested to be another source of pollution. Two wastewater treatment plants located at Qalyubia Governorate named Qalyub (QWTP) and Shubra Al-khayma (SHWTP) were selected to carry out the present study; two samples from influent and effluent were collected seasonally from both plants. Furthermore, 6 groundwater samples were collected from nearby rural houses of both plants. The physicochemical and microbiological properties were evaluated for all samples. Moreover, BOX-PCR for 12 strains isolated from wastewater and groundwater at Qalyub district was carried out. Water quality assessment studies and field observations proved that the seasonal variations had no impact on all sampling sites but 2point source contamination3. The effectiveness of the two wastewater treatment plants under investigation is questionable, especially QWTP. The percentages of removing of TSS, COD, BOD, ammonia, total coliform and faecal coliform counts were 87, 74, 88, 66, 94 and 89%, respectively, for QWTP, and 85, 89, 93, 86, 94 and 83%, respectively, for SHWTP.The groundwater at Qalyub district was contaminated with Mn, Fe, ammonia, BOD, coliform bacteria, faecalstreptococci, E.coli, Aeromonashydrophila and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, while the groundwater at Shubra Al-khayma district was contaminated with Mn, coliform bacteria, faecalstreptococci and P. aeruginosa. Microbial and chemical evaluation of groundwater, as well as, BOX-PCR results confirmed that water treatment plants have no negative impact on the quality of shallow groundwater. To purify the contaminated groundwater with bacteria, a designed filter was suggested

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image
Share
Cairo University Libraries Portal Implemented & Customized by: Eng. M. Mohamady Contacts: new-lib@cl.cu.edu.eg | cnul@cl.cu.edu.eg
CUCL logo CNUL logo
© All rights reserved — Cairo University Libraries
CUCL logo
Implemented & Customized by: Eng. M. Mohamady Contact: new-lib@cl.cu.edu.eg © All rights reserved — New Central Library
CNUL logo
Implemented & Customized by: Eng. M. Mohamady Contact: cnul@cl.cu.edu.eg © All rights reserved — Cairo National University Library