<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02994cam a2200349 a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">EG-GiCUC</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20250223032727.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210412s2021    ua dho f m    000 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">EG-GiCUC</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">EG-GiCUC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Deposite</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="097" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ph.D</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="099" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Cai01.11.24.Ph.D.2021.Al.C</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Alshymaa Mohamed Mostafa Elnagar</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Comparative study between anterior lamellar recession with and without blepharoplasty in upper eyelid cicatricial entropion / </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Alshymaa Mohamed Mostafa Elnagar ; Supervised Haytham Ezzat Nasr , Sameh Hassan Abdelbaky , Kareem Bakr Elessawy</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="a">&#x62F;&#x631;&#x627;&#x633;&#x629; &#x645;&#x642;&#x627;&#x631;&#x646;&#x629; &#x628;&#x64A;&#x646; &#x625;&#x631;&#x62C;&#x627;&#x639; &#x627;&#x644;&#x637;&#x628;&#x642;&#x629; &#x627;&#x644;&#x623;&#x645;&#x627;&#x645;&#x64A;&#x629; &#x645;&#x639; &#x623;&#x648; &#x628;&#x62F;&#x648;&#x646; &#x62A;&#x642;&#x648;&#x64A;&#x645; &#x627;&#x644;&#x62C;&#x641;&#x646; &#x641;&#x649; &#x62D;&#x627;&#x644;&#x627;&#x62A; &#x625;&#x644;&#x62A;&#x648;&#x627;&#x621; &#x627;&#x644;&#x62C;&#x641;&#x646; &#x627;&#x644;&#x639;&#x644;&#x648;&#x649; &#x627;&#x644;&#x62F;&#x627;&#x62E;&#x644;&#x649; &#x627;&#x644;&#x62A;&#x644;&#x64A;&#x641;&#x649; </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Cairo : </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Alshymaa Mohamed Mostafa Elnagar , </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2021</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">113 P. : </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">charts , facsimiles , photoghrphs ; </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">25cm </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Ophthalmology</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Purpose: It is to compare the surgical outcome, the patient satisfaction and the aesthetic outcome between anterior lamellar recession only and anterior lamellar recession with blepharoplasty in the treatment of upper eyelid cicatricial entropion. Patients and methods: This study included a total of 44 eyelids of 30 patients divided randomly into two groups. Group A: 22 eyelids of 15 patients had an anterior lamellar recession technique (ALR). Group B: 22 eyelids of 15 patients had an anterior lamellar recession with blepharoplasty. Main outcomes are the surgical results, the patient satisfaction and the aesthetic outcome. Results: At the end of 6 months follow up, success rate of group A was 81.8% (72.7% had complete success while 9.1% had partial success), and failure was 18.2%, while it was 100% (95.5% had complete success while 4.5% had partial success), with no failure reported in group B.The aesthetic outcome was fair in 31.8% and poor in 68.2% in group A, while it was good in 77.3% and fair in 22.7% in group B. There was a highly significant statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.001*). Patient satisfaction was 72.7% (45.5% were satisfied while 27.3% were partially satisfied) and 27.3% were dissatisfied in group A, while it was 95.4% (90.9% were satisfied while 4.5% were partially satisfied) and 4.5% were dissatisfied in group B. There was a highly significant statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.005*)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Issued also as CD</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Anterior lamellar recession</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Blepharoplasty </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Upper eyelid cicatricial entropion </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Haytham Ezzat Nasr , </subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Supervisor</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kareem Bakr Elessawy , </subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Supervisor</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Sameh Hassan Abdelbaky , </subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Supervisor</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://172.23.153.220/th.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Nazla</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Revisor</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="905" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Shimaa</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Cataloger</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">TH</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">80631</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">80631</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">CUCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">cl210</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2024-02-11</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">Cai01.11.24.Ph.D.2021.Al.C</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">01010110083239000</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2023-09-22 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">TH</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">CUCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">cl2u8</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2024-02-11</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">Cai01.11.24.Ph.D.2021.Al.C</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">01020110083239000</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2023-09-22 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">83239.CD     </subfield>
    <subfield code="y">CD</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
