header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Evaluation of marginal bone loss after Immediate implant placement in maxillary esthetic zone with nanobone versus xenograft : Randomized clinical trial / Abdullah Mohammed Ali Farahat ; Supervised Ragia Mohamed Mounir , Mohamed Mounir Shaker

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Abdullah Mohammed Ali Farahat , 2019Description: 111 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • تقييم فقدان العظم الهامشى بعد وضع غرسة أسنان فورية فى منطقة الفك العلوى الجمالية بإستخدام تطعيم عظمي بجزيئات النانو مقابل تطعيم عظمى أجنبى : تجربة سريرية عشوائية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Summary: This study was performed to evaluate marginal bone loss using nanobone (Art-Oss) versus xenograft (Hypro-oss) in immediate implant placement in esthetic zone. Sixteen Neo-biotech two piece implants were conducted in 16 fresh extraction sockets in eleven patients with one or more hopeless teeth indicated for extraction in the region of maxillary anterior teeth. All patients were systemically free and with reasonable oral hygiene.Extraction sockets were randomly distributed into two groups. The first group(Group A) received immediate post-extraction implants with nanobone to fill the peri-implant bony defect (jumping gap) While (Group B) received immediate post-extraction implants with bovine xenograft to fill the peri-implant bony defect.Preoperative measures were performed including clinical and radiographic assessement to ensure proper case selection. A sulcular mucoperiosteal flap was raised then an atraumatic protocol was followed to deliver the tooth outside the socket. The implants were placed simultaneously in fresh extraction sockets after proper irrigation.The patients of group A received nanobone graft to fill the marginal gap while group B received bovine xenograft. The bovine xenograft and nanobone were mixed with saline and were introduced inside the gap using a graft carrier and condensers.The graft was packed loosely to allow for pooling of blood between the graft particles
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2019.Ab.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110079303000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.09.13.M.Sc.2019.Ab.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 79303.CD Not for loan 01020110079303000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

This study was performed to evaluate marginal bone loss using nanobone (Art-Oss) versus xenograft (Hypro-oss) in immediate implant placement in esthetic zone. Sixteen Neo-biotech two piece implants were conducted in 16 fresh extraction sockets in eleven patients with one or more hopeless teeth indicated for extraction in the region of maxillary anterior teeth. All patients were systemically free and with reasonable oral hygiene.Extraction sockets were randomly distributed into two groups. The first group(Group A) received immediate post-extraction implants with nanobone to fill the peri-implant bony defect (jumping gap) While (Group B) received immediate post-extraction implants with bovine xenograft to fill the peri-implant bony defect.Preoperative measures were performed including clinical and radiographic assessement to ensure proper case selection. A sulcular mucoperiosteal flap was raised then an atraumatic protocol was followed to deliver the tooth outside the socket. The implants were placed simultaneously in fresh extraction sockets after proper irrigation.The patients of group A received nanobone graft to fill the marginal gap while group B received bovine xenograft. The bovine xenograft and nanobone were mixed with saline and were introduced inside the gap using a graft carrier and condensers.The graft was packed loosely to allow for pooling of blood between the graft particles

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image
Share
Under the supervision of New Central Library Manager

Implemented and Customized by: Eng.M.Mohamady
Contact:   info@cl.cu.edu.eg

© All rights reserved  New Central Library