Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Efficacy of mammographic artificial intelligence in detecting different histopathological subtypes of breast cancer / Hedaya Wasfy Ali Mohamed ; Supervised Mariam Raafat Louis Bouls , Basma Mohamed Alkalaawy , Passant Essam Eldin Ahmed Shibel

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Hedaya Wasfy Ali Mohamed , 2020Description: 116 P. : charts , facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • فاعلية الذكاء الاصطناعى بالتصوير الشعاعى للثدى فى الكشف عن الأنواع النسيجية المختلفة لسرطان الثدى [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Radio-Diagnosis Summary: Background:Mammography screening currently relies on subjective human interpretation. Artificial intelligence (AI) advances could be used to increase mammography screening accuracy by reducing missed cancers and false positives.AI-based algorithms can also increase the efficiency of interpretation workflows by reducing workload and interpretation time Methods: The study was prospectively carried on 123 female patients with 134 pathologically proven malignant breast lesion (between December 2020 to June 2021); the mean age was 53.6 ± SD 12.0 years old.Females coming to breast imaging unit either for screening or with breast complaint, basic sono-mammography was done. Artificial intelligence images were automatically generated by AI software (Lunit INSIGHT for mammography) from mammographic images. Biopsieswere done for suspicious breast lesions.Artificial intelligence results as well as mammography results were correlated to the pathology as the gold reference standard. Results: Artificial intelligence has higher sensitivity than mammography in detecting malignant breast lesions; sensitivity of the two methods (AI and mammography) was 96.6% vs 87.3% and false negative rate 3.4% vs 12.7% respectively. Also AI was more sensitive to detect cancers with suspicious mass 95.2% vs 75%, suspicious calcifications 100% vs 86.5% as well as asymmetry and distortion 100% vs 84.6%.AI has better performance in detecting different histopathological subtype of breast malignancy as DCIS, IDC and ILC than mammography with sensitivity (100%, 96.7%, 96.6%) vs (88.9%, 89%, 82.2%) respectively.While in other rare types of breast malignancy both AI and mammography showed the same sensitivity 80%
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.31.M.Sc.2020.He.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110084730000
CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.31.M.Sc.2020.He.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 84730.CD Not for loan 01020110084730000

Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Radio-Diagnosis

Background:Mammography screening currently relies on subjective human interpretation. Artificial intelligence (AI) advances could be used to increase mammography screening accuracy by reducing missed cancers and false positives.AI-based algorithms can also increase the efficiency of interpretation workflows by reducing workload and interpretation time Methods: The study was prospectively carried on 123 female patients with 134 pathologically proven malignant breast lesion (between December 2020 to June 2021); the mean age was 53.6 ± SD 12.0 years old.Females coming to breast imaging unit either for screening or with breast complaint, basic sono-mammography was done. Artificial intelligence images were automatically generated by AI software (Lunit INSIGHT for mammography) from mammographic images. Biopsieswere done for suspicious breast lesions.Artificial intelligence results as well as mammography results were correlated to the pathology as the gold reference standard. Results: Artificial intelligence has higher sensitivity than mammography in detecting malignant breast lesions; sensitivity of the two methods (AI and mammography) was 96.6% vs 87.3% and false negative rate 3.4% vs 12.7% respectively. Also AI was more sensitive to detect cancers with suspicious mass 95.2% vs 75%, suspicious calcifications 100% vs 86.5% as well as asymmetry and distortion 100% vs 84.6%.AI has better performance in detecting different histopathological subtype of breast malignancy as DCIS, IDC and ILC than mammography with sensitivity (100%, 96.7%, 96.6%) vs (88.9%, 89%, 82.2%) respectively.While in other rare types of breast malignancy both AI and mammography showed the same sensitivity 80%

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image
Share
Cairo University Libraries Portal Implemented & Customized by: Eng. M. Mohamady Contacts: new-lib@cl.cu.edu.eg | cnul@cl.cu.edu.eg
CUCL logo CNUL logo
© All rights reserved — Cairo University Libraries
CUCL logo
Implemented & Customized by: Eng. M. Mohamady Contact: new-lib@cl.cu.edu.eg © All rights reserved — New Central Library
CNUL logo
Implemented & Customized by: Eng. M. Mohamady Contact: cnul@cl.cu.edu.eg © All rights reserved — Cairo National University Library