000 02308nam a2200301Ia 4500
005 20250223033121.0
008 231030s9999 xx 000 0 und d
049 _aDeposit
082 _a617.471
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.11.25.M.Sc.2022.Ah.o
100 _aBy Ahmed mustafa hussein lbrahim mohamed,
245 _aOperative versus non-operative treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures, in absence of absolute indications for ORIF /
_cAhmed mustafa hussein lbrahim mohamed؛Prof. Dr. Hesham Mesbah Dr. Begad Hesham،Dr. Mohamed Refaat.
246 _aدراسة مقارنة فى كسور منتصف عظمة الترقوة بين العلاج التحفظى والتثبيت بشريحة
260 _c2022.
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.)-Cairo University,2022. .
504 _aBibliography: p. 88-100.
520 _aBackground: There is a growing interest towards operative management. Clavicle plating can be on anterior or superior surface. We sought to compare patient-oriented outcomes and complication rates following plating on both surfaces. Materials and methods: This was a prospective clinical trial study involving 36 patients with displaced mid shaft clavicle fractures were randomized by closed envelope to operative treatment with superior plates (18 patients) or anterior plates (18 patients). Outcome analysis included standard clinical 6-months follow-up, including patient- oriented functional scores (Constant shoulder score and VAS pain score), in addition to plain radiographs. There were no statistical differences between the two groups with respect to patient demographics, mechanism of injury or fracture pattern. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between plating on superior surface and anterior surface regarding union, functional scores, return to ADLs, hardware problems or complications. Conclusion: Both superior and anterior clavicle plating are safe treatment methods for displaced clavicle fractures and they lead to similar operative outcomes.
650 _aMidshaft.
653 _afractures
700 _aMohamed Refaat
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aMohamady
942 _cTH
_2ddc
999 _c164189
_d164189
336 _2rda content
_atext
337 _2rdamedia
_aUnmediated
338 _2rdacarrier
_avolume