000			02834cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223031214.0
008			150415s2013 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.09.13.M.Sc.2013.Re.E
100	0		_aReham Mohamed Ali
245	1	0	_aEvaluation of the importance of only labial injection in extraction of lower anterior teeth / _cReham Mohamed Ali ; Supervised Basma Gamal Moussa , Osman Elabasy , Gamal Mohamed Moutamed
246	1	5	_aتقييم أهمية الحقن الخدى فقط للتخدير الموضعى لخلع الأسنان الأمامية فى الفك السفلى
260			_aCairo : _bReham Mohamed Ali , _c2013
300			_a55 Leaves : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c30cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
520			_aHundred volunteers of either sex ranging from 30 to 45 years were participated in this study. The patients were presenting to Outpatient Clinic, needed extraction of anterior teeth in the lower jaw. The 100 patients were divided into two equal groups, 50 of them had mepivacaine HCL local anaesthesia and the other 50 had articaine HCL. Each group divided into two equal subgroups one had labial and lingual infiltrations and the other subgroup had labial infiltration only. Then patients had the extraction. Pain scores due to anesthetic procedure and extraction were recorded by patient by visual analogue scale (VAS) from zero to 10. Before extraction the labial and lingual anesthetic effect were checked using an explorer prob. The data were collected and analyzed using (SAS) software. In articaine group; during anesthesia there was no statistically significant difference between mean VAS scores of buccal and lingual infiltration techniques and buccal infiltration technique only, also during extraction there is no statistically significant difference between mean VAS scores of the two techniques. In mepivacaine group; during anesthesia there was no statistically significant difference between mean VAS scores of the buccal and lingual infiltration techniques and buccal infiltration technique only but during extraction buccal and lingual infiltration technique showed statistically low mean VAS score than labial injection only
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aExtraction
653		4	_aLower anterior teeth
653		4	_aOnly labial injection
700	0		_aBasma Gamal Moussa , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aGamal Mohamed Moutamed , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aOsman Elabasy , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aSamia _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c50441 _d50441