000 03886cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223031231.0
008 150525s2014 ua h f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aPh.D
099 _aCai01.12.04.Ph.D.2014.Ha.E
100 0 _aHany Mohammed Abdelaal Ammar
245 1 0 _aEvaluation of the peripheral dose and the conformity index for three stereotactic radiotherapy techniques; ARCS, noncoplanar fixed fields and intensity modulation/
_cHany Mohammed Abdelaal Ammar ; Supervised Wafaa Mohamed Khalil , Mohammed Saad Zaghloul , Ehab Marouf Attalla ,
246 1 5 _a{uFE97}{uFED8}{uFEAA}{uFEF3}{uFEAE} ا{uئإؤئ}{uئإء٠}{uئإءإ}{uئإأآ}{uئإ٨إ}ت ا{uئإؤئ}{uئإإ٤}{uئإإ٨}{uئإء٨}{uئإؤ٤}{uئإأ٠}{uئإإء} و{uئإإ٣}{uئإأأ}{uئإ٨إ}{uئإإ٣}{uئإؤإ} ا{uئإؤئ}{uئإ٩٨}{uئإإإ}ا{uئإؤ٣}{uئإؤ٦} {uئإؤئ}{uئإ٩أ}{uئإئأ}ث {uئإأ٣}{uئإءإ}ق {uئإؤئ}{uئإإ٠}{uئإأأ}{uئإئأ}ج ا{uئإئآ}{uئإآ٧}{uئإأأ}اعى ا{uئإؤئ}{uئإء٠}{uئإءإ}ا{uئإء٣}{uئإئ٢} {uئإ٩آ}{uئإئأ}{uئإ٩آ}{uئإئ٢} ا{uئإئآ}{uئإ٩١}{uئإأأ}{uئإ٨إ}د ({uئإأ٣}{uئإءإ}{uئإئ٣}{uئإؤ٨}{uئإ٩٤} ا{uئإئآ}{uئإؤ٧}{uئإإإ}اس: {uئإأ٣}{uئإءإ}{uئإئ٣}{uئإؤ٨}{uئإ٩٤} ا{uئإؤئ}{uئإء٤}{uئإؤ٨}{uئإإإ}ل ا{uئإؤئ}{uئإ٩أ}{uئإ٨إ}{uئإ٩١}{uئإ٩٨}{uئإإء} {uئإإ٣}{uئإ٩٨}{uئإأأ}{uئإءء}دة ا{uئإؤئ}{uئإإ٤}{uئإآ٤}{uئإ٩٨}{uئإإإ}{uئإئ٣}{uئإ٨إ}ت وا{uئإؤئ}{uئإأأ}{uئإئأ}ج {uئإإ٣}{uئإ٩٨}{uئإؤ٠}{uئإئ٤}{uئإءإ} ا{uئإؤئ}{uئإآ٨}{uئإءء}{uئإإ٩}
260 _aCairo :
_bHany Mohammed Abdelaal Ammar ,
_c2014
300 _a96 P. :
_bfacsimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Science - Department of Biophysics
520 _aPurpose:The main aim of this work is to compare the conformity index and the peripheral doses absorbed during stereotactic treatment of a brain lesion delivered using three stereotactic techniques; Arcs, noncoplanar fixed conformal fields(3DCRT) and intensity modulation(IMRT).Materials and Methods: Ten patients with different tumor sizes, shapes and localisations were selected for this study. Treatment plans were generated using three different techniques: Arcs, noncoplanar fixed fields and intensity modulation techniques. Treatment plans (Arcs, IMRT, 3DCRT) were created for the pediatric anthropomorphic phantom for different target sizes To measure and calculate the Peripheral Doses(PDs).Results: The IMRT technique shows the highest dose conformity, Arcs technique is the next homogeneity followed by 3DCRT.The results show that Arcs technique has the lowest volume of the body that received 2 Gy, IMRT is the next followed by 3DCRT and IMRT technique has the lowest volume of the body that received 5 Gy, Arcs technique is the next followed by 3DCRT. IMRT plan delivery time almost has two folded more than the two others techniques, and the arc the technique has the lowest estimated time compared to both IMRT and Conformal techniques. the IMRT technique has the highest values of PDs at distanc close to the PTV the next is Arcs technique followed by 3DCRT technique which has the lowest values
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aCofirmty Index
653 4 _aOut-of-field doses
653 4 _aStereotactic Radiosurgery
700 0 _aEhab Marouf Attalla ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aMohammed Saad Zaghloul ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aWafaa Mohamed Khalil ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aAml
_eCataloger
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c51027
_d51027