| 000 | 03259cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223031242.0 | ||
| 008 | 150628s2014 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.09.08.M.Sc.2014.Os.C | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aOsama Mohamed Magdy | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aComparative clinical evaluation of the use of platelet rich fibrin membrane and acellular Dermal matrix allograft with coronally positioned flap in treatment of multiple gingival recessions / _cOsama Mohamed Magdy ; Supervised Shahira Elashiry , Ahmed Elbarbary |
| 246 | 1 | 5 | _a{uFEA9}{uFEAD}{uFE8D}{uFEB3}{uFE94} {uFEE3}{uFED8}{uFE8E}{uFEAD}{uFEE7}{uFE94} {uFE8D}{uFEDB}{uFEE0}{uFEF4}{uFEE8}{uFEF4}{uFEDC}{uFEF4}{uFE94} {uFE91}{uFEF4}{uFEE6} {uFE8D}{uFEDF}{uFEB4}{uFEE0}{uFEA8}{uFE94} {uFE8D}{uFEDF}{uFE98}{uFE8E}{uFE9F}{uFEF4}{uFE94} {uFE8D}{uFEDF}{uFEE4}{uFE98}{uFED8}{uFEAA}{uFEE3}{uFE94} {uFEE3}{uFECA} {uFE8D}{uFEDF}{uFEE8}{uFEB4}{uFEF4}{uFE9E} {uFE8D}{uFEDF}{uFEA0}{uFEE0}{uFEAA}{uFEF1} {uFE8D}{uFEDF}{uFED0}{uFEF4}{uFEAE}{uFEA7}{uFEE0}{uFEEE}{uFEF1} {uFEE3}{uFED8}{uFE8E}{uFE91}{uFEDE} {uFE8D}{uFEDF}{uFEB4}{uFEE0}{uFEA8}{uFE94} {uFE8D}{uFEDF}{uFE98}{uFE8E}{uFE9F}{uFEF4}{uFE94} {uFE8D}{uFEDF}{uFEE4}{uFE98}{uFED8}{uFEAA}{uFEE3}{uFE94} {uFEE3}{uFECA} {uFE8D}{uFECF}{uFEB8}{uFEF4}{uFE94} {uFE8D}{uFEDF}{uFEE0}{uFEF4}{uFED4}{uFEF4}{uFEE6} {uFE8D}{uFEDF}{uFED0}{uFEE8}{uFEF4}{uFE94} {uFE91}{uFE8E}{uFEDF}{uFEBC}{uFED4}{uFE8E}{uFE8B}{uFEA2} {uFE8D}{uFEDF}{uFEAA}{uFEE3}{uFEEE}{uFEF3}{uFE94} {uFED3}{uFEF2} {uFECB}{uFEFC}{uFE9D} {uFE8D}{uFEE7}{uFEA4}{uFEB4}{uFE8E}{uFEAD} {uFE8D}{uFEDF}{uFEE0}{uFE9C}{uFE94} |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bOsama Mohamed Magdy , _c2014 |
||
| 300 |
_a98 Leaves : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c30cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Periodontology | ||
| 520 | _aAcceptable root coverage can be achieved in class I and II marginal tissue recessions using Alloderm or PRF membrane combined with coronally positioned flap with no significant differences between both groups, in the Alloderm group statistically significant changes were noted throughout the follow up periods (baseline-3months, baseline-6 months) while in the PRF group significant changes were noted only through baseline-6 months which emphasizes the need for a longer observation period as regards the PRF group, in the PRF group, less postoperative discomfort and tenderness of the involved area was reported when compared to the alloderm sites, in addition to its ease of application, it has the advantage of being an autologous, biocompatible and viable biomaterial, PRF may be a good alternative to alloderm in treatment of gingival recession since alloderm is of a high cost and not all patients can afford it. | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aAcellular dermal matrix allograft | |
| 653 | 4 | _aCemento-enamel junction | |
| 653 | 4 | _aClinical attachment level | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aAhmed Elbarbary , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aShahira Elashiry , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aSoheir _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c51454 _d51454 |
||