000 | 02960cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
005 | 20250223031516.0 | ||
008 | 160529s2015 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
041 | 0 | _aeng | |
049 | _aDeposite | ||
097 | _aM.Sc | ||
099 | _aCai01.09.08.M.Sc.2015.Sa.C | ||
100 | 0 | _aSarah Elsayed Ibrahim Elshourbagy | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aClinical evaluation of vascularized interpositional periosteal connective tissue flap versus subepithelial connective tissue graft to improve the soft tissue biotype around immediately placed dental implant = _bالتقييم السريرى لزراعة الاسنان الفوريه باستخدام نوعين مختلفين من الطعم من الانسجه الضامه / _cSarah Elsayed Ibrahim Elshourbagy ; Supervised Mona Salah Eldeen Darhous , Hani Mahmoud Essam Elnahass |
246 | 1 | 5 | _aالتقييم السريرى لزراعة الاسنان الفوريه باستخدام نوعين مختلفين من الطعم من الانسجه الضامه |
260 |
_aCairo : _bSarah Elsayed Ibrahim Elshourbagy , _c2015 |
||
300 |
_a98 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Periodontology | ||
520 | _aAim : To evaluate the efficacy of vascularized interpositional periosteal connective tissue flap (VIP-CT) to improve the soft tissue thickness, keratinized tissue width and esthetics around immediately placed dental implants versus subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG). Materials and methods: 14 implants were inserted immediately in 12 patients (7 implants in each group) after atraumatic extraction of irrestorable teeth in the esthetic zone. Soft tissue augmentation was performed simultanously with implant placement. In the control group SCTG was performed while in test group VIP-CT was performed.zirconia crowns were fabricated at 4th month. Soft tissue parameters were measured at1st ,3rd ,6th and 9th month after the procedure. While Pink esthetic score was assessed at 6th and 9th month. Results: In SCTG Group as well as VIP-CT Group, there was a statistically significant increase in mean KT(keratized tissue thickess) after 1 month. However, at the base line as well as through all follow up periods, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in keratinized tissue thickness and pink esthetic score. Conclusions:The two techniques resulted in a significant increase in the soft tissue thickness and enhancement of the esthetics | ||
530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
653 | 4 | _aEsthetics | |
653 | 4 | _aImmediate implant | |
653 | 4 | _aVIP-CT flap | |
700 | 0 |
_aHani Mahmoud Essam Elnahass , _eSupervisor |
|
700 | 0 |
_aMona Salah Eldeen Darhous , _eSupervisor |
|
856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
905 |
_aSoheir _eCataloger |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
999 |
_c56703 _d56703 |