000			03033cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223031522.0
008			160615s2016 ua h f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.21.09.M.Sc.2016.Mo.M
100	0		_aMohammed Helmy Abdo Abdelhamid
245	1	0	_aMyofascial release versus cold laser in the treatment of low back dysfunction trigger points / _cMohammed Helmy Abdo Abdelhamid ; Supervised Ragia Mohammed Kamel , Yosry Mahmod Mostafa , Ahmed Taha Farrag
246	1	5	_aالتليين الشغثي العضلي بالمقارنة بالليزر البارد في علاج نقاط الألم المصاحبة لآلام الظهر
260			_aCairo : _bMohammed Helmy Abdo Abdelhamid , _c2016
300			_a80 P. : _bfacesimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science
520			_aBackground: Low back dysfunction is one of the most common reasons for which patients seek treatment. Purpose: To compare between the effects of cold LASER therapy and myofascial release technique for treatment of trigger points that accompany low back dysfunction; as regards to pain improvement, tenderness and mobility enhancement. Subjects, Materials and Methods: Thirty low back dysfunction patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A: 15 subjects received myofascial release treatment in addition to traditional treatment and their ( ± SD) of age, weight, height, and BMI were (45.33 ± 8.64) years, (78 ± 4.68) kg, (168.4 ± 6.76) cm and (27.63 ± 2.69) kg/m² respectively. As for Group B : 15 subjects received cold LASER therapy in addition to traditional treatment and their ( ± SD) of age, weight, height, and BMI were (46.27 ± 8.06) years, (79.07 ± 8.41) kg, (169.4± 6.75) cm and (27.6 ± 3.1) kg/m² respectively. Both groups received 3 sessions weekly for 12 sessions (4 weeks). Data collected from both groups before and after the treatment program included pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), tenderness measured by hand-held force algometer and mobility measured by Modified Modified Schober test. Results: results demonstrated that the pre-post treatment measurements of the dependent variables showed a significant improvement in both groups. Meanwhile, results suggested a significant difference between the post-treatment measurements of both groups, which was in favor of group A and the p-values of pain, tenderness and mobility were 0.0001, 0.006 and 0.0001 respectively
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aLASER therapy
653		4	_aLow back dysfunction
653		4	_aTenderness
700	0		_aAhmed Taha Farrag , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aRagia Mohammed Kamel , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aYosry Mahmod Mostafa , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aAml _eCataloger
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c56927 _d56927