| 000 | 02877cam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223031609.0 | ||
| 008 | 161107s2015 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aPh.D | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.11.20.Ph.D.2015.Sa.F | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aSalama Gomaa Abdelhalim Koraitim | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aFixed versus dynamic cervical implants in treatment of cervical disc diseases / _cSalama Gomaa Abdelhalim Koraitim ; Supervised Esam Rashad Algehawyd , Mohamed Badran Abdelsalam Alshenawy , Mohamed Mohamed Mohi Eldin Albasiuny |
| 246 | 1 | 5 | _aدراسة مقارنـه بين التثبيت الاستاتيكي والتثبيت الديناميكي في العلاج الجراحي لأمراض الغضروف العنقي |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bSalama Gomaa Abdelhalim Koraitim , _c2015 |
||
| 300 |
_a127 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Neurosurgery | ||
| 520 | _aObjective: This study details analysis of the indications, safety, efficacy and complications of dynamic cervical replacement for replacement of cervical disc in cases cervical disc diseases compared to PEEK cage insertion. Results: Average age of presentation was 44.1 years for both groups, female ratio for the fixed group was 1.5:1, and 1:1.08 for the dynamic group, with age ranged between 35 and 53 years for both studies with an average of 44.1 +/- 6.345 years. The average duration of symptoms was 51.4 weeks.. The average follow up period in our study was 22.5 months, 21 cases had left sided radiculopathy, 10 cases had right sided affection. The most common presenting symptom after brachialgia (100%) was neck pain, most common sign was sensory changes. Most common operated level was C5-6 for both groups. The average follow up period in our study was 22.5 months with no recurrence, instability or progressive kyphosis. Conclusion: The dynamic cervical implant (DCI) is the alternative to cage fusion and total disc prosthesis with a wider range of indications. The DCI implant offers stable, controlled (adequate) motion to already significantly degenerated motion segments. In addition the implant is axial compliant offering capabilities to avoid overloading and accelerated degeneration of the adjacent segments above and below the treated segment | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aCervical spine | |
| 653 | 4 | _aDisc herniation | |
| 653 | 4 | _aRadiculopathy | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aEsam Rashad Algehawyd , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMohamed Badran Abdelsalam Alshenawy , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMohamed Mohamed Mohi Eldin Albasiuny , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aSoheir _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c58475 _d58475 |
||