000			03187cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223031623.0
008			161208s2016 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.11.15.M.Sc.2016.Al.R
100	0		_aAlshimaa Mahmoud Abdelsalam Ahmed Elbakshishy
245	1	4	_aThe Relation between endometrial volume by three-dimensional ultrasound and histopathology in women with postmenopausal bleeding / _cAlshimaa Mahmoud Abdelsalam Ahmed Elbakshishy ; Supervised Samah Sayed Aboulgheit , Mohamad Faisal Ibrahim , Mahmoud Mohamed Abdelhamed Soliman
246	1	5	_aالعلاقه بين حجم بطانة الرحم بالموجات فوق الصوتية ثلاثيه الأبعاد وتحليل الانسجة الباثولوجى فى السيدات ذوات نزيف ما بعد انقطاع الحيض
260			_aCairo : _bAlshimaa Mahmoud Abdelsalam Ahmed Elbakshishy , _c2016
300			_a95 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics
520			_aPostmenopausal bleeding (PMB) accounts for 5% of all gynecologic office visits. PMB must always be investigated because many causes may be premalignant or malignant. The current study is designed to determine the relationship between endometrial volume as measured by three- dimensional ultrasound imaging and the histopathological findings in the endometrium in women with postmenopausal bleeding and endometrial thickness more than 6mm. Results: Examination of the D&C samples revealed hyperplasia of the endometrium in 77 patients, atrophic endometrium in 17 patients and endometrial carcinoma in 6 patients. Hyperplasia was of simple type in 56 patients and of the complex type in 21 patients. The mean endometrial thickness was 12.3 cm ±5.77, minimum 6 (maximum was 36 mm), the mean endometrial volume was 9.84 ±20.8 (minimum 1.58 and maximum 140.5 cm3). The mean endometrial thickness in patients with endometrial carcinoma was 26.46±8.98 while in the non-malignant patient was 11.39 ± 4.00. This difference was significant statistically (P<0.01). The mean endometrial volume in the carcinoma group was 69.69±61.22 while in the non-tumorous patients it was 6.02 ± 3.63. This difference was also statistically significant (P<0.01). Conclusion: Endometrial volume was significantly different when used to compare between atrophic endometrium, benign endometrial pathology (endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial atrophy), and endometrial carcinoma (P < 0.001). further studies are needed to determine the exact cutoff value in those patients
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_a3D Ultrasound
653		4	_aBleedeing
653		4	_aPostmenopausal
700	0		_aMahmoud Mohamed Abdelhamed Soliman , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aMohamad Faisal Ibrahim , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aSamah Sayed Aboulgheit , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aSoheir _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c58929 _d58929