000			03346cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223031825.0
008			171014s2017 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.11.24.M.Sc.2017.Am.A
100	0		_aAmr Mohamed Abdelaziz Wassef
245	1	0	_aAssessment of intraocular pressure using ocular response analyzer and goldman applanation tonometry before and after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) / _cAmr Mohamed Abdelaziz Wassef ; Supervised Khaled Abdeljalil Mansour , Soheir Mohamed Essmat , Heba Magdy Ahmed
246	1	5	_aقياس ضغط العين باستخدام جهاز تحليل إستجابة العين وجهاز جولدمان لقياس ضغط العين عن طريق تسطيح القرنية قبل وبعد زرع القرنية
260			_aCairo : _bAmr Mohamed Abdelaziz Wassef , _c2017
300			_a73 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Ophthalmology
520			_aTo compare the obtainability and values of IOP measurements by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT) and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) before and after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) testing the degree of their agreement and the impact of corneal biomechanical factors on IOP measurement. Patients and Methods The study is a comparative prospective study in which patients scheduled for penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) undergo intraocular pressure measurement (IOP) using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) then the Goldman applanation tonometer (GAT) one day before surgery to be repeated one month after their surgery. Results Forty patients undergoing PKP were enrolled in the study, 28 males (70%) and 12 females 30%). The mean age of patients involved is 42.8 ± 15.4, ranging between 9 and 75 years. Obtainability of ORA (92.5% of the patients) was significantly higher than GAT (60%) postoperatively (p<0.001), while no significant difference was elicited preoperatively. The mean cornea corrected IOP (IOPcc) was significantly higher than GAT and Goldmann related IOP (IOPg) both pre and postoperatively. In addition, both mean IOPcc and GAT postoperatively (19.2 ± 8.31, 15.65 ± 6.99 mmhg respectively) were significantly higher than their preoperative values (14.44 ± 7.03, 11.78 ± 4.55 mmhg respectively). Strong correlations existed between GAT and ORA measurements both pre and postoperatively. As expected the level of agreement between GAT and IOPg was higher than IOPcc. Conclusion ORA has proven to be superior to GAT in the ability to obtain reliable IOP measurements post PKP. IOPcc measurements also prooved to be relavant, independent on corneal biomechanical factors (CH and CRF) but judging the accuracy of its values needs further large scale studies.
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aIntraocular pressure
653		4	_aOcular Response Analyzer
653		4	_aPenetrating Keratoplasty
700	0		_aHeba Magdy Ahmed , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aKhaled Abdeljalil Mansour , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aSoheir Mohamed Essmat , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShimaa _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c62924 _d62924