| 000 | 03046cam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223032053.0 | ||
| 008 | 181001s2018 ua dho f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aPh.D | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.24.03.Ph.D.2018.Ah.S | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aAhmed Elprince Mohamed Ragab | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aStudy of the effect of low level laser therapy on bone repair in rats / _c Ahmed Elprince Mohamed Ragab ; Supervised Yousry Mahmoud Mostafa , Nashwa Taher Abdelaziz , Ahmed Hassan Hussein |
| 246 | 1 | 5 | _aدراسة تأثير الليزر المنخفض الشدة على إلتئام العظام فى الفئران |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bAhmed Elprince Mohamed Ragab , _c2018 |
||
| 300 |
_a101 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles , photographs ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - National Institute of Laser Enhanced Science - Department of Laser Applications on in Medical and Biological | ||
| 520 | _aObjective: This study was conducted to determine the effect of low level laser therapy (LLLT) on bone repair in rats. Materials and methods: Seventy two rats were assigned randomly into three groups, group (A) consisted of twenty four rats whose bone fracture didn{u2019}t receive laser therapy, group (B) consisted of twenty four rats whose bone fracture received He-Ne laser (632.8 nm) and group (C) consisted of twenty four rats whose bone fracture received Ga-As laser (905 nm). Each group was subdivided into three subgroups according to their sacrificing day on 15th, 30th and 45th post-operative days. Assessment of bone fracture healing was done through radiological analysis and histopathological analysis. Results: The results of this study revealed that group (C) showed more complete bone regeneration on 15th and 30th post-operative days when compared with groups (A&B) according to the radiological findings. According to the histopathological analysis, on 15th and 30th postoperative days, there was no statistically significant difference between groups (A&B) (p > 0.05) in newly formed blood vessels, fibroblasts, osteiod and bone formation scores. While, there was a significant difference between groups (A&C) and (B&C) (p value < 0.05) in favor of group (C). Conclusion: Ga-As laser showed a bio-stimulating effect on the rate of bone repair by stimulating the modulation of the initial inflammatory response and anticipating the resolution to normal condition at the earlier periods. Both He-Ne and Ga-As lasers were not different from the control group on 45th postoperative day | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aBone repair | |
| 653 | 4 | _aLow level laser therapy | |
| 653 | 4 | _aLow level laser therapy (LLLT) | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aAhmed Hassan Hussein , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aNashwa Taher Abdelaziz , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aYousry Mahmoud Mostafa , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aShimaa _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c67762 _d67762 |
||