000 03231cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032053.0
008 181001s2016 ua f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.09.09.M.Sc.2016.Ma.A
100 0 _aMarwah Mohammed Elsherief Anas Elwegoud
245 1 0 _aAttachment systems for maxillary and mandibular implant-supported overdentures :
_ba systematic review and meta-analysis /
_cMarwah Mohammed Elsherief Anas Elwegoud ; Supervised Amal Fathy Kaddah , Aly Eldin Galal , Ahmed Emad Fayyad
246 1 5 _aالوصلات المحكمه للغرسات الداعمه للطقم الفوقي الكامل السفلي و العلوي :
_bمراجعه منهجيه
260 _aCairo :
_bMarwah Mohammed Elsherief Anas Elwegoud ,
_c2016
300 _a112 P. ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Prosthodontics
520 _aBackground Implant-supported overdenture is one of the most predictable treatment options used to restore completely edentulous patients. It offers a retentive and a stable prosthesis resulting in higher patient satisfaction and improved oral functions. Various attachment systems are actively used to anchor the overdentures to the underlying implants, but differences have been reported between them in terms of patient satisfaction, prosthesis retention, and attachment maintenance. Objectives To compare the effectiveness of different attachment systems of implant-supported overdentures for completely edentulous patients to improve patient satisfaction and enhance prosthesis retention, and attachment maintenance. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trial register (13 November 2014), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 11), MEDLINE ( January 1966 to 13 November 2014) and the WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (13 November 2014). We handsearched citation lists of relevant publications. We did not apply any language or date restrictions. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of the different attachment systems used to retain the implant-supported overdentures in completely edentulous patients. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked for accuracy. We have expressed results as risk ratio (RR) or mean differences (MD), together with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcome measures were patient satisfaction, prosthesis retention, and attachment maintenancetulous patients to improve patient satisfaction and prosthesis retention, and attachment maintenance
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aBall attachments
653 4 _aBar attachments
653 4 _aComplete edentulism
700 0 _aAhmed Emad Fayyad ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aAly Eldin Galal ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aAmal Fathy Kaddah ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aShimaa
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c67765
_d67765