| 000 | 02869cam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223032136.0 | ||
| 008 | 181222s2018 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aPh.D | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.11.12.Ph.D.2018.El.A | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aElham Mo{u2019}men Hassan Mohammed | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAssessment of dysphonia : _bCepstral spectral analysis versus traditional acoustic analysis / _cElham Mo{u2019}men Hassan Mohammed ; Supervised Hossam Mohammed Eldessouky , Mohammed Hussein Badr Eldeen , Sahar Saad Shohdi |
| 246 | 1 | 5 |
_aتقييم الخلل الصوتي : _bالتحليل الصوتي الطيفي الكيبسترالي مقابل التحليل الصوتي التقليدي |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bElham Mo{u2019}men Hassan Mohammed , _c2018 |
||
| 300 |
_a115 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of E.N.T | ||
| 520 | _aAcoustic analysis including both spectral and cepstral analyses is an objective and easy assessment tool for diagnosis and follow up of dysphonia. Objective: the aim is to investigate the cepstral voice analysis as a valid method for assessment of dysphonia and comparing it to the traditional spectral voice analysis in a sample of Egyptian population. Subjects and Methods: the study was carried out by applying a voice assessment protocol used in Phoniatric unit of Cairo University on 140 subjects who were divided into 2 groups, dysphonia group includes 70 subjects and control group includes 70 subjects. The voice samples in the form of sustained vowel /a/ phonation and 6 different contexts of continuous speech of all subjects were recorded and assessed using auditory perceptual analysis, spectral analysis and cepstral analysis. Results: The present study revealed statistical significant difference for both traditional (time based) and cepstral analyses between cases and control groups and among different grades of dysphonia during sustained vowel and continuous speech conditions apart from speech context 1. Jitter analysis was found to have the best predictive ability during sustained phonation with sensitivity of 92.86% and a specificity of 82.86%, while measures of CPPs analysis were found to have the best predictive ability during continuous speech with sensitivity of 88.57% and a specificity of 77.14% | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aAcoustic analysis | |
| 653 | 4 | _aCepstral analysis | |
| 653 | 4 | _aDysphonia | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aHossam Mohammed Eldessouky , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMohammed Hussein Badr Eldeen , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aSahar Saad Shohdi , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aShimaa _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c69196 _d69196 |
||