| 000 | 02766cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223032401.0 | ||
| 008 | 190917s2019 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aPh.D | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.13.05.Ph.D.2019.Mo.M | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aMohamed Kamal Hussein Mohamed | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aModeling and evaluation of strip footings on anchored geosynthetic reinforcedsoil overlaying loose sand / _cMohamed Kamal Hussein Mohamed ; Supervised Mohamed Ibrahim Amer , Rami Mahmoud Elsherbiny |
| 246 | 1 | 5 | _aنمذجة وتقييم الأساسات الشريطية على تربة مسلحة بطبقات من الانسجة المصنعة المثبتة تعلو طبقة من الرمل السائب |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bMohamed Kamal Hussein Mohamed , _c2019 |
||
| 300 |
_a141 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Engineering - Department of Civil Engineering | ||
| 520 | _aThis thesis presents the results of laboratory and numerical models to study the behavior of shallow footings resting on anchored geosynthetic reinforced dense soil overlying loose. Laboratory model tests are performed to study the effect of reinforcement length, reinforcement depth, number of layers, and anchorage condition on the performance of a strip footing on geosynthetic reinforced soil. Finite element verification is performed using Plaxis 2D and an additional parametric study is performed to numerically investigate the effect of reinforcement length, deadman height, deadman width, and geosynthetic stiffness for different anchored geogrid configurations. An analytical method is developed to calculate the tensile forces in the reinforcement and ultimate bearing capacity.The pullout resistance of the geogrid significantly increases when anchoring the edges due to the development of passive resistance on the deadman resulting in an increase in bearing capacity. Uniform strains are generated along anchored reinforcement compared to the bell-shaped strain curve for conventional reinforcement. The optimum reinforcement length is six times the footing width for conventional reinforcement, on the other hand, the optimum reinforcement length is equal to footing width plus reinforcement depth for anchored reinforcement | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aAnchored Geosynthetic Reinforcement | |
| 653 | 4 | _aPullout Resistance | |
| 653 | 4 | _aShallow Foundations | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aMohamed Ibrahim Amer, _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aRami Mahmoud Elsherbiny , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aShimaa _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c73958 _d73958 |
||