| 000 | 03181cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223032441.0 | ||
| 008 | 191119s2018 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aPh.D | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.09.03.Ph.D.2018.Ma.O | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aMary Sabry Tawfik Tadros | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aOne-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill resin composite using FDI criteria in comparison to conventional incremental posterior restoration / _cMary Sabry Tawfik Tadrosb ; Supervised Mohamed Adel Ezzat , Maha Abdelsalam Elbaz |
| 246 | 1 | 5 |
_aالتقييم الاكلينيكى لسنه واحده لماده الراتنج بتقنية الكتلة باستخدام معايير الاستثمار الاجنبى المباشر مقابل الحشو الخلفى التدريجى التقليدى : _bتجربة اكلينيكية عشوائية |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bMary Sabry Tawfik Tadros , _c2018 |
||
| 300 |
_a72 P. : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Operative Dentistry | ||
| 520 | _aOur study evaluated and compared the clinical performance and durability of Bulk fill composite versus conventional incremental posterior composite filling in class I posterior composite resin restorations bonded with self-etch adhesive strategies. Sixty-nine patients were randomly selected, their age range from 20 to 50 years old. They were divided into two main groups according to the packing technique of composite material; incremental Tetric Evoceram and Tetric Evoceram bulk fill composite. Sixty nine patients (n=69) were selected for incremental Tetric Evoceram composite restorations. 69 patients (n=69) were selected for Tetric Evoceram bulk fill composite restorations, resulting in a total of 138 restorations bonded with self-etch adhesive system in a split mouth technique. Clinical performance assessed at 6 months and 1 year using FDI criteria through visual inspection by two expert assessors. Our results revealed that in two groups; clinical performance of all restorations in the two groups showed clinically excellent / very good condition after 6 months. But after 12 months, regarding nano-hybrid incremental packing technique group; there was a statistically significant change in color match criteria after 12 months. There was a decrease in prevalence of excellent / very good condition and an increase in prevalence of clinically sufficient / satisfactory condition. As results showed a slight mismatch in color after 1 year within the normal range of the adjacent tooth structure. While in Bulk fill group, there was no statistically significant change in color match criteria after 12 months | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aBulk-fill resin composite | |
| 653 | 4 | _aConventional incremental posterior | |
| 653 | 4 | _aFDI | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aMaha Abdelsalam Elbaz , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aMohamed Adel Ezzat , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 905 |
_aShimaa _eCataloger |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c75295 _d75295 |
||