| 000 | 03231cam a2200337 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EG-GiCUC | ||
| 005 | 20250223032528.0 | ||
| 008 | 200227s2019 ua do f m 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 049 | _aDeposite | ||
| 097 | _aM.Sc | ||
| 099 | _aCai01.09.03.M.Sc.2019.Ha.R | ||
| 100 | 0 | _aHaneen Ahmed Shafik Elmoselhy | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aReliability of secondary caries detection around composite restoration using light induced fluorescence in comparison to visual tactile method : _bDiagnostic accuracy study / _cHaneen Ahmed Shafik Elmoselhy ; Supervised Olfat Elsayed Hassanein , Mohamed Fouad Haridy |
| 246 | 1 | 5 |
_aفاعلية تحديد التسوس الثانوى حول الحشوات الراتنجية المركبة باستخدام الكاميرا ذات الاشعاع الضوئى فى مقابل الطريقة الحسية البصرية : _bدراسة الدقة التشخيصية |
| 260 |
_aCairo : _bHaneen Ahmed Shafik Elmoselhy , _c2019 |
||
| 300 |
_a94 P. : _bcharts , photographs ; _c25cm |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Operative Dentistry | ||
| 520 | _aAim of the study : The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and reproducibility of secondary caries diagnosis using light induced fluorescence device 2Soprolife3 in comparison to conventional visual-tactile method according to modified USPHS restoration assessment Methodology : A total of 29 volunteer patients were assigned in this study. Each patient had at least one defected posterior occlusal resin composite restoration. The restoration was evaluated by two diagnostic methods; the visual tactile examination and assessment using the modified USPHS criteria and the light fluorescence device SOPROLIFE (SOPRO, ACTEON Group, La Ciotat, France). This method involves an intraoral LED light-emitting diode camera offering the ability to detect and locate differences in density, structures, and/or chemical composition of hard tooth tissues.The blue LED, selected by the device, emits at a 450 nm-wavelength which excites a light fluorescence signal re-transmitted by dentine. The spectrum of the fluorescence signal is green when the dentine is healthy and dark red when the dentine is infected (according to the SOPROLIFE manufacturer{u2019}s instructions). According to modified United States Public Health Service USPHS/ Ryge criteria Direct Clinical Evaluation of Restoration , which states the use of an eye without any magnification device, only a dental mirror and an explorer, in a proper isolated field following the directions to assess secondary caries existence. Prior to the initiation of the study, calibration sessions were arranged for the 3 operators using the two methods separately in the examination site | ||
| 530 | _aIssued also as CD | ||
| 653 | 4 | _aLight induced fluorescence | |
| 653 | 4 | _aSecondary caries | |
| 653 | 4 | _aVisual tactile method | |
| 700 | 0 |
_aMohamed Fouad Haridy , _eSupervisor |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aOlfat Elsayed Hassanein , _eSupervisor |
|
| 856 | _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf | ||
| 905 |
_aAsmaa _eCataloger |
||
| 905 |
_aNazla _eRevisor |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cTH |
||
| 999 |
_c76797 _d76797 |
||