000			02996cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223032546.0
008			200824s2019 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aM.Sc
099			_aCai01.11.31.M.Sc.2019.Ma.C
100	0		_aMarwa Abdellatif Elsayed Hegazy
245	1	0	_aConventional versus automated three-dimensional breast ultrasound in the detection and characterization of breast masses / _cMarwa Abdellatif Elsayed Hegazy ; Supervised Fatma Mohamed Awad , Sherihan Waheed Yousry Gareer , Tamer Mostafa Manie
246	1	5	_aمقارنة الموجات فوق الصوتية الثلاثية الابعاد الألية والموجات فوق الصوتيه التقليديه فى إيجاد وتمييز كتل الثدى
260			_aCairo : _bMarwa Abdellatif Elsayed Hegazy , _c2019
300			_a101 P. : _bcharts , facaimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Radio-Diagnosis
520			_aBackground: Although mammography remains the gold standard for breast imaging, it has undergone increased criticism. HHUS and mammography find significantly more early-stage breast cancers than mammography alone. However, HHUS is time consuming and has a high number of false positives. New technologies for breast cancer screening have been developed, including ABUS. Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical utility of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) against handheld ultrasound (HHUS) in detecting and characterizing breast masses. Patients and methods: This study included 47 female patients of different age groups, having breast mass(es) on conventional ultrasound. HHUS and ABUS were done for all patients and evaluated by two experienced radiologists. Assessment of the breast masses was performed using BIRADS lexicon. Statistical analysis of the collected data was carried out to compare the performance of HHUS versus ABUS. Results: ABUS and HHUS showed agreement in 53 breast lesions; 4 were BIRADS II,14 lesions were BIRADS III, 9 lesions were BIRADS IV and 26 lesions were BIRADS V. One lesion was given BIRADS IVC by HHUS but BIRADS III by ABUS and histopathologically was fibroadenoma. One mass was missed by HHUS being obscured by nipple shadow, detected by ABUS as BIRADS III.Conclusion: From this study, ABUS rather than HHUS should be implemented as an adjunct to mammography for better detection and characterization of breast masses
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_a2D ultrasound
653		4	_a3D automated breast ultrasound
653		4	_aDigital mammography
700	0		_aFatma Mohamed Awad , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aSherihan Waheed Yousry Gareer , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aTamer Mostafa Manie , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
905			_aShimaa _eCataloger
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c77363 _d77363