000 03492cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032631.0
008 201116s2018 ua dho f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aPh.D
099 _aCai01.09.06.Ph.D.2018.Mo.E
100 0 _aMohamed Atfy Abdelmotaleb
245 1 0 _aEvaluating efficiency of using vibrating device (AcceleDent) in accelerating canine retraction :
_bRandomized clinical trial /
_cMohamed Atfy Abdelmotaleb ; Supervised Ahmed Abdelsalam , Amr Emad Eldakroury , Fouad Sharaby
246 1 5 _aدراسة اكلينكية عشوائية :
_bتتقيم جهاز الاهتزاز (الاكسلى دنت) فى سرعة جذب الناب
260 _aCairo :
_bMohamed Atfy Abdelmotaleb ,
_c2018
300 _a139 P . :
_bcharts , facsmilies , photographs ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Orthodontics
520 _a The current study was a Randomized Controlled clinical Trial that was performed to investigate three dimensionally; using digital models and Cone Beam Computed Tomography imaging, the effect of vibrational devise (AcceleDent) on the rate of tooth movement in a canine retraction model. The sample consisted of 32 patients requiring bilateral upper first premolars extraction and canine retraction with maximum anchorage. The sample was recruited from the outpatient clinic of the Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University. They were randomly allocated to experimental group using AcceleDent aura appliance 20 mins daily and the other group was control group. After placement of the fixed orthodontic appliance, levelling and alignment proceeded till 0.016" {u00D7} 0.022" st.st upper archwire. Indirect skeletal anchorage was then prepared using TADs inserted bilaterally between the upper 1st molar and 2nd premolar, and the patient was referred for upper 1st premolars extraction. After that 0.017 x 0.025 inch st.st. wire was inserted and canine retraction was performed using NiTi coil springs delivering 150 g of force/side. The experimental group received AcceleDent aura device in the same day of starting canine retraction with instruction of how to use it. Data were collected from monthly upper impressions, which were poured into stone models and scanned to obtain sequential digital models, in addition to pre- and post-retraction maxillary CBCT images. From the results of the clinical and statistical analyses, and within the limitations of this study, the following conclusions could be withdrawn: 1. Orthodontic tooth movement couldn{u2019}t be accelerated by AcceleDent aura (vibrational forces). 2. Pain level couldn{u2019}t be reduced by Vibrational force with an AcceleDent device during orthodontic treatment. 3. Root condition was not affect by vibrational forces. 4. Indirect anchorage using mini-screws did not offer absolute anchorage. 5. Digital models were powerful tools in assessment of orthodontic tooth movement.
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aAcceleDent
653 4 _aAcceleration
653 4 _aTooth movement
700 0 _aAhmed Abdelsalam ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aAmr Emad Eldakroury ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aFouad Sharaby ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aAmira
_eCataloger
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c78809
_d78809