000 03090cam a2200349 a 4500
003 EG-GiCUC
005 20250223032840.0
008 211102s2021 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040 _aEG-GiCUC
_beng
_cEG-GiCUC
041 0 _aeng
049 _aDeposite
097 _aM.Sc
099 _aCai01.21.06.M.Sc.2021.Es.L
100 0 _aEsraa Mahmoud Mahmoud
245 1 0 _aLow level laser therapy versus iontophoresis post supracondylar humerus fracture in children /
_cEsraa Mahmoud Mahmoud ; Supervised Eman Ibrahim Elhadidy , Heba Gaber Abdelaziz , Mohamed Mohamed Safaa Eldeen
246 1 5 _aدراسة مقارنة بين تأثير الليزر منخفض الشدة والانتقال الايونى بعد كسر اعلى لقمة الكوع العظمية فى الاطفال
260 _aCairo :
_bEsraa Mahmoud Mahmoud ,
_c2021
300 _a109 P. :
_bcharts , facsimiles ;
_c25cm
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Growth and Development Disorders in Pediatrics
520 _aBackground and Purpose: Supracondylar humerus fractures are the most frequent fractures in children, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning is the gold standard surgical treatment. Low level laser therapy (LLLT) and iontophoresis are noninvasive and cost-effective approach in the field of physiotherapy. The purpose: to compare between the post-operative effects of LLLT and Iontophoresis on range of motion (ROM) and pain level of elbow joint in children with supracondylar humerus fracture. Subjects and Methods: Sixty six children from both sexes with supracondylar humerus fracture underwent surgical intervention, their ages ranged from 4 to 10 years. They were recruited from Fayoum University Hospitals after two weeks from removing the pins and the cast. They were randomly assigned into three groups in equal numbers (A, B, C). Control group (A) received traditional exercises program only, study group (B) received iontophoresis and traditional exercises program as group (A) and study group (C) received LLLT and traditional exercises program as group (A), for 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks.The ROM (flexion and extension) and pain level (pain intensity and pressure pain threshold PPT) of affected elbow were measured at the beginning of the study and after 4 weeks of suggested treatment programs. Results: There was no significant difference between three groups (control and two study groups) pre-treatment (p > 0.05). Comparison between groups post treatment revealed a significant increase in elbow ROM and PPT of group B and C compared with that of control group A (p < 0.01)
530 _aIssued also as CD
653 4 _aIontophoresis
653 4 _aPost-operative
653 4 _aSupracondylar humeral fracture
700 0 _aEman Ibrahim Elhadidy ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aHeba Gaber Abdelaziz ,
_eSupervisor
700 0 _aMohamed Mohamed Safaa Eldeen ,
_eSupervisor
856 _uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905 _aNazla
_eRevisor
905 _aShimaa
_eCataloger
942 _2ddc
_cTH
999 _c82944
_d82944