000			02954cam a2200349 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223032905.0
008			271221s2021 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aPh.D
099			_aCai01.21.02.Ph.D.2021.Ra.L
100	0		_aRasha Mahmoud Hussain Elmarakby
245	1	0	_aLung boost training effect on ventilatory functions in choral singers / _cRasha Mahmoud Hussain Elmarakby ; Supervised Awny Fouad Rahmy , Nesreen Gharib Elnahas , Mohamed Mahmoud Elbatanony
246	1	5	_aتأثير التدريب بداعم الرئة على القدرات الوظيفية لدى مغنيى الكورال
260			_aCairo : _bRasha Mahmoud Hussain Elmarakby , _c2021
300			_a86 P . : _bcharts , facsimiles ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Physical Therapy for Cardiopulmonary & Geriatrics disorders
520			_aBackground and Purpose: There are well-known benefits of Breathing Exercise on ventilatory functions in singers, as well as impact of training to manage breathing while performance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct the effect of lung boost as a respiratory muscle trainer on selected ventilatory function in choral singers. Materials and Methods: Sixty subjects of both sexes 36 girls and 24 boys with age ranged from 10-20 years old were chosen from Arabic Music Band in Qasr Al-Thaqafa in Fayoum city they were assigned into 2 equal groups in numbers group (A)(21 girls and 9 boys) while group B (15 girls and 15 boys).Both of groups (A) and (B) carried out traditional exercise program for10 weeks 3 sessions per week with deep breathing exercise in form of(diaphragmatic, nose breathing exercises and exercise connected with respiration using upper limbs)only 30 subjects in group (A) trained with respiratory muscle training by Lung Boost plus the traditional exercise program . Ventilatory functions were measured for both groups (Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1), Forced Expiratory Volume in six second (FEV6), ratio of FEV1/FEV6 and calculated Maximal Voluntary Ventilation (MVV) at the beginning of the study and after 10 weeks. Results: Comparing both groups{u2018} percent of change revealed that there were statistically significant increases in FEV1 6.46%, FEV6 3.32%, FEV1/FEV6 3.19%, MVV 6.38% (p<0.05) in favor of group (A) and FEV1 1.20%, FEV6 0.22%, FEV1/FEV6 1.10%, MVV 1.18% in Group (B)
530			_aIssued also as CD
653		4	_aChoral singers
653		4	_aLung Boost
653		4	_aVentilatory functions
700	0		_aAwny Fouad Rahmy , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aMohamed Mahmoud Elbatanony , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aNesreen Gharib Elnahas , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aAmira _eCataloger
905			_aNazla _eRevisor
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c83724 _d83724