000			03028nam a2200313 a 4500
003			EG-GiCUC
005			20250223032934.0
008			220803s2021 ua dh f m 000 0 eng d
040			_aEG-GiCUC _beng _cEG-GiCUC
041	0		_aeng
049			_aDeposite
097			_aPh.D
099			_aCai01.09.08.2021.Mu.R
100	0		_aMustafa Gameel Mustafa Darweesh
245	1	0	_aRoot Coverage With Connective Tissue Graft Associated With Vista Versus Tunnel Technique In Miller Class I And Ii Recession Defects : _bA Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial / _cMustafa Gameel Mustafa Darweesh ; Supervised Mona Ali Shoeib , Weam Ahmed Elbattawy
246	1	5	_aتجربة اكلينيكية بفحص عشوائى : _bتغطية الجذر برقعة من النسيج الضام بالاتحاد مع تقنية فيستا او النفق
260			_aCairo : _bMustafa Gameel Mustafa Darweesh , _c2021
300			_a160 P . : _bcharts,facsmilies ; _c25cm
502			_aThesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and dental medicine - Department of Periodontology
520			_aBackground: Multiple gingival recessions are usually more challenging over single recession ones. Tunnelling technique aims to preserve esthetics, papillary integrity and avoid scar formation by excluding vertical incisions. But being a sensitive blind technique with increased trauma to sulcular epithelium led to the proposal of VISTA technique which avoids some of the potential complications occurring with intrasulcular incisions. Materials and methods: 20 patients (12 females and 8 males) with multiple Miller class I and II recession defects were treated with SCTG in conjugation with either VISTA or Tunneling technique. Patients were randomly assigned to VISTA (n=10) or Tunneling technique (n=10). Recession depth, width, pocket depth, clinical attachment level, keratinized tissue width and gingival thickness were evaluated after 6 months. The esthetic outcomes were evaluated by assessing the root coverage esthetic score and percentage of root coverage while patient reported outcomes as pain and edema were assessed through VAS based questionnaires.Results: After 6 months there was a statistically significant difference between (VISTA+SCTG) and (Tunneling+SCTG) regarding gingival thickness, pain and edema scores in favor of the VISTA group but there was a statistically significant reduction in keratinized tissue width with VISTA technique after 3 and 6 months. There was a statistically significant reduction in recession depth, width, clinical attachment level and probing depth after 6 months. No statistically significant difference exited between the two groups regarding the percentage of root coverage or the root coverage esthetic score
530			_aIssued also as CD
650		0	_ateeth
700	0		_aMona Ali Shoeib , _eSupervisor
700	0		_aWeam Ahmed Elbattawy , _eSupervisor
856			_uhttp://172.23.153.220/th.pdf
905			_aAmira _eCataloger
905			_eRevisor
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c84702 _d84702