Implant placement in horizontally deficient maxillary aesthetic zone with simultaneous soft tissue augmentation using de-epithelialized free gingival graft and its effect on esthetics : A case series study /
Maged Maher Hakeem
Implant placement in horizontally deficient maxillary aesthetic zone with simultaneous soft tissue augmentation using de-epithelialized free gingival graft and its effect on esthetics : A case series study / دراسة تسلسلية : زراعة الاسنان في المنطقة الجمالية بالفك العلوى ذات خلل عظمى افقى بالتزامن مع زيادة النسيج الرخو باستخدام طعم لثوى حر منزوع الظهارة و تأثيرها على الناحية الجمالية Maged Maher Hakeem ; Supervised Mohamed Mokhtar Khashaba , Mohamed Atef Abdelrasol - Cairo : Maged Maher Hakeem , 2021 - 91 P . : charts , facsmilies , photographs ; 25cm
Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and dental medicine - Department of Prosthodontics
Results: There was a statistically significant increase in median PES post-operatively (P-value = 0.003, Effect size = 4.179), mean PES pre-operatively was 8.09 (0.94) that increased to 12.09 (0.94) six months postoperative the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05), mean implant stability immediately postoperative was 66.45 (1.57) that increased to 75.55 (2.5) six months postoperative the difference was statistically significant (P-value <0.001, Effect size = 3.971). (P 0.05). There was a statistically significant increase in mean bucco-palatal dimensions postoperatively at the coronal, middle as well as apical levels, (P-value <0.001, Effect size = 0.983), (P-value <0.001, Effect size = 0.925) and (P-value <0.001, Effect size = 0.969), respectively. Mean bucco-palatal dimensions pre-operatively at the coronal, middle, apical levels were 8.86 (1.47), 11.02 (1.61), 13.8 (1.97) respectively that increased to 10.5 (1.39), 12.54 (1.66), 15.26 (2.05) respectively six months postoperative. While, There was no statistically significant difference between mean amounts of change in bucco-palatal dimensions at the coronal, middle and apical levels compared with each other (P-value = 0.303, Effect size = 0.112). where the mean SD values were 1.64 (0.23), 1.53 (0.46), 1.46 (0.27) respectively (P 0.05)
Aesthetic zone Implant Maxillary
Implant placement in horizontally deficient maxillary aesthetic zone with simultaneous soft tissue augmentation using de-epithelialized free gingival graft and its effect on esthetics : A case series study / دراسة تسلسلية : زراعة الاسنان في المنطقة الجمالية بالفك العلوى ذات خلل عظمى افقى بالتزامن مع زيادة النسيج الرخو باستخدام طعم لثوى حر منزوع الظهارة و تأثيرها على الناحية الجمالية Maged Maher Hakeem ; Supervised Mohamed Mokhtar Khashaba , Mohamed Atef Abdelrasol - Cairo : Maged Maher Hakeem , 2021 - 91 P . : charts , facsmilies , photographs ; 25cm
Thesis (M.Sc.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and dental medicine - Department of Prosthodontics
Results: There was a statistically significant increase in median PES post-operatively (P-value = 0.003, Effect size = 4.179), mean PES pre-operatively was 8.09 (0.94) that increased to 12.09 (0.94) six months postoperative the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05), mean implant stability immediately postoperative was 66.45 (1.57) that increased to 75.55 (2.5) six months postoperative the difference was statistically significant (P-value <0.001, Effect size = 3.971). (P 0.05). There was a statistically significant increase in mean bucco-palatal dimensions postoperatively at the coronal, middle as well as apical levels, (P-value <0.001, Effect size = 0.983), (P-value <0.001, Effect size = 0.925) and (P-value <0.001, Effect size = 0.969), respectively. Mean bucco-palatal dimensions pre-operatively at the coronal, middle, apical levels were 8.86 (1.47), 11.02 (1.61), 13.8 (1.97) respectively that increased to 10.5 (1.39), 12.54 (1.66), 15.26 (2.05) respectively six months postoperative. While, There was no statistically significant difference between mean amounts of change in bucco-palatal dimensions at the coronal, middle and apical levels compared with each other (P-value = 0.303, Effect size = 0.112). where the mean SD values were 1.64 (0.23), 1.53 (0.46), 1.46 (0.27) respectively (P 0.05)
Aesthetic zone Implant Maxillary