Evaluation of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography-based registration and multislice computed tomography-based registration for oral and maxillofacial surgery : In vitro study / Yara Rabia Mohamed Ali Helaly ; Supervised Mushira Mohamed Dahaba , Hany Mahmoud Omar , Mohamed Khalifa Zayet
Material type:
- تقييم دقة المطابقة بالحاسوب مخروطية الشعاع و المطابقة بحاسوب الأشعة المقطعية لجراحة الوجة و الفكين : دراسة مختبرية [Added title page title]
- Issued also as CD
Item type | Current library | Home library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.09.13.Ph.D.2016.Ya.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan | 01010110070904000 | ||
![]() |
مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم | المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة | Cai01.09.13.Ph.D.2016.Ya.E (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 70904.CD | Not for loan | 01020110070904000 |
Browsing المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Objectives: Multislice computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography scans data are used at a variety of applications in medical and dental fields. Among these applications is image registration that has become an essential step in medical images processing as radiation therapy, oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthodontics, {u2026}etc,. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of MSCT- and CBCT- based registration for oral and maxillofacial surgery on dry human mandibles. Materials and Methods: The current study comprised ten dry human mandibles scanned twice using a MSCT scanner and scanned twice using a CBCT scanner. The registration accuracy was evaluated by superimposing both images sets for each mandible (of the same modality) then measuring the distance between the two images at definite points. This was done with both modalities. To compare various point based registration techniques, the two images of the same mandible were superimposed three times with different registration points; bone landmarks, dental landmarks, and fiducial markers then the distance between the two images was measured for the three techniques. This was done with both modalities. Results: The results of the current study demonstrated that CBCT showed lower mean discrepancy in the measurements than MSCT
Issued also as CD
There are no comments on this title.