header
Local cover image
Local cover image
Image from OpenLibrary

Comparative study on beef, buffalo and camel emulsion-type meat products / Amr Hammed Abouelezz Alseify ; Supervised Taha M. Nouman , Mohamed M.T. Emara , Hyam. A. Mansour

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Amr Hammed Abouelezz Alseify , 2018Description: 68 P. : charts ; 25cmOther title:
  • دراسة مقارنة عن منتجات لحوم الأبقار والجاموس والجمال المستحلبة [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc. ) - Cairo University - Faculty of Veterinary Medicine - Department of Food Hygiene and Control Summary: A total of 140 beef frankfurter and Egyptian luncheon sausage samples were investigated to evaluate its quality. Most Luncheon Sausage samples had low sensory panel scores, low protein, and high ash content as well as low shear force values that revealed low quality with marked high lightness and brownness for all sausages. on the other hand, examined beef frankfurter sausage samples were advantageous over that of luncheon in most physicochemical characteristics especially protein, fat, moisture content, high pH and TVBN ,shear force and brownness values.Meanwhile, beef frankfurter had higher aerobic and anaerobic bacterial counts. Both beef frankfurter and luncheon sausage had low eating quality characteristics.Three trials based experiments were performed to compare the effect of meat species on quality of luncheon sausage produced with the same percentage and formula. Beef and buffalo luncheon sausage were indistinguishable in their organoleptic characteristics, while camel type sausage had only slight significant difference in moisture and protein content, but was not differ significantly with buffalo sausage in fat and ash content. Remarked emulsion stability was recognized in buffalo meat batter.The overall acceptability scores for beef and buffalo luncheon sausage did not differ significantly and nearly undistinguishable for the panellist
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.10.06.M.Sc.2018.Am.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110076762000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.10.06.M.Sc.2018.Am.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 76762.CD Not for loan 01020110076762000

Thesis (M.Sc. ) - Cairo University - Faculty of Veterinary Medicine - Department of Food Hygiene and Control

A total of 140 beef frankfurter and Egyptian luncheon sausage samples were investigated to evaluate its quality. Most Luncheon Sausage samples had low sensory panel scores, low protein, and high ash content as well as low shear force values that revealed low quality with marked high lightness and brownness for all sausages. on the other hand, examined beef frankfurter sausage samples were advantageous over that of luncheon in most physicochemical characteristics especially protein, fat, moisture content, high pH and TVBN ,shear force and brownness values.Meanwhile, beef frankfurter had higher aerobic and anaerobic bacterial counts. Both beef frankfurter and luncheon sausage had low eating quality characteristics.Three trials based experiments were performed to compare the effect of meat species on quality of luncheon sausage produced with the same percentage and formula. Beef and buffalo luncheon sausage were indistinguishable in their organoleptic characteristics, while camel type sausage had only slight significant difference in moisture and protein content, but was not differ significantly with buffalo sausage in fat and ash content. Remarked emulsion stability was recognized in buffalo meat batter.The overall acceptability scores for beef and buffalo luncheon sausage did not differ significantly and nearly undistinguishable for the panellist

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image