header
Image from OpenLibrary

Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization versus myofascial release on mechanical neck pain / Zeinab Salah Eldein Mohamed Abdelaziz ; Supervised Neveen Abdellatif Abdelraoof , Mohamed Serag Eldein Mahgoub , Mohamed Rabeea Abdallah

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Zeinab Salah Eldein Mohamed Abdelaziz , 2021Description: 98 P. : charts , facsimiles , photoghraphs ; 25cmOther title:
  • جهاز مساعدة الانسجة الرخوة مقابل الافراج الليفى العضلى على ألام الرقبة الميكانيكية [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science Summary: Background:Mechanical neck pain commonly arises insidiously and is generally multifactorial in origin, including one or more of the following: poor posture, anxiety, depression, neck strain Purpose: To compare the efficacy of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) versus myofascial release on patients with mechanical neck pain. Methods: Forty-five ( 20 male and 25 female) patients aged 25 to 40 years were randomly assigned into 3 equal groups. Each group consistsed of 15 patients. Group (A) received Garston technique plus a selected physical therapy treatment. Group (B) received myofascial release plus a selected physical therapy treatment. Group (C) received the selected physical therapy treatment only. They were evaluated pre and post-treatment for neck pain severity by the visual analogue scale, functional ability using neck disability index, range of motion using an inclinometer, and tenderness by pressure algometer. Results: There was a significant difference post-treatment between instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and myofascial release. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and myofascial release were more effective than the control group in relieving pain,improve functional disability, and increase range of motion, with greater improvement in instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization group compared with myofascial release group
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.Ph.D.2021.Ze.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110085409000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.21.09.Ph.D.2021.Ze.I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 85409.CD Not for loan 01020110085409000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Department of Basic Science

Background:Mechanical neck pain commonly arises insidiously and is generally multifactorial in origin, including one or more of the following: poor posture, anxiety, depression, neck strain Purpose: To compare the efficacy of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) versus myofascial release on patients with mechanical neck pain. Methods: Forty-five ( 20 male and 25 female) patients aged 25 to 40 years were randomly assigned into 3 equal groups. Each group consistsed of 15 patients. Group (A) received Garston technique plus a selected physical therapy treatment. Group (B) received myofascial release plus a selected physical therapy treatment. Group (C) received the selected physical therapy treatment only. They were evaluated pre and post-treatment for neck pain severity by the visual analogue scale, functional ability using neck disability index, range of motion using an inclinometer, and tenderness by pressure algometer. Results: There was a significant difference post-treatment between instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and myofascial release. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and myofascial release were more effective than the control group in relieving pain,improve functional disability, and increase range of motion, with greater improvement in instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization group compared with myofascial release group

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.