header
Image from OpenLibrary

Morphological endosonographic evaluation of anal sphinecter integrity post stapling and conventional hemorrhoidectomy / Emad Fathy Oraby ; Supervised Medhat Mahmoud Assem , Ahmed Farag Ahmed Farag , Ahmed Mohamed Sayed Marzouk

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cairo : Emad Fathy Oraby , 2014Description: 165 P. : facsimiles ; 25cmOther title:
  • تقييم الخصائص التشريحيه لعضلات الشرج باستخذام الاشعه التلفزيونية عن طريق الشرج ما بعد جراحات البواسير بالطريقه العاديه واستخذام الدباسه [Added title page title]
Subject(s): Available additional physical forms:
  • Issued also as CD
Dissertation note: Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of General Surgery Summary: Background: We aimed in this randomized clinical trial to compare the results of traditional versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy for treatment of third and fourth degree hemorrhoids. Methods:Thirty patients admitted for surgical treatment of prolapsing hemorrhoids were randomly assigned to traditional (n=15) or stapled hemorrhoidectomy (n=15). All patients received standardized preoperative and postoperative analgesic and laxative regimens. Patients were compared for postoperative pain, continence and sphincter thickness. Results: No statistically significant difference was found regarding postoperative pain or sphincter thickness between both groups. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy showed significant improvement of continence score unlike open surgery. Conclusion: both procedures are safe effective surgical procedures for treatment of hemorrhoidectomy with better functional results achieved with stapled hemorrhoidectomy. With no significant change of the internal anal sphincter thickness and integrity between the two procedure
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Thesis Thesis قاعة الرسائل الجامعية - الدور الاول المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.14.Ph.D.2014.Em.M (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 01010110066409000
CD - Rom CD - Rom مخـــزن الرســائل الجـــامعية - البدروم المكتبة المركزبة الجديدة - جامعة القاهرة Cai01.11.14.Ph.D.2014.Em.M (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 66409.CD Not for loan 01020110066409000

Thesis (Ph.D.) - Cairo University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of General Surgery

Background: We aimed in this randomized clinical trial to compare the results of traditional versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy for treatment of third and fourth degree hemorrhoids. Methods:Thirty patients admitted for surgical treatment of prolapsing hemorrhoids were randomly assigned to traditional (n=15) or stapled hemorrhoidectomy (n=15). All patients received standardized preoperative and postoperative analgesic and laxative regimens. Patients were compared for postoperative pain, continence and sphincter thickness. Results: No statistically significant difference was found regarding postoperative pain or sphincter thickness between both groups. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy showed significant improvement of continence score unlike open surgery. Conclusion: both procedures are safe effective surgical procedures for treatment of hemorrhoidectomy with better functional results achieved with stapled hemorrhoidectomy. With no significant change of the internal anal sphincter thickness and integrity between the two procedure

Issued also as CD

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.