أطروحة (دكتوراه)-جامعة القاهرة، 2023.

ببليوجرافيا: صفحات 110-116.

هدفت الدراسة إلى تقييم دور القيادة الأبوية في إدارة المشاريع باعتبارها "حالة"
دراسة" من خلال الاستبيانات واختبار الفرضيات الرئيسية والفرعية. وخلصت الدراسة إلى أن
النتائج التالية:
 صحة الفرضية الرئيسية حيث ثبت وجود علاقة معنوية
بين القيادة الأبوية وإدارة المشاريع في شركة العربي جروب للتجارة والصناعة.
 صحة الفرضيات الفرعية التسع التي تنبثق من الفرضيات الرئيسيةالفرضية ، حيث
ثبت أن هناك علاقات ذات دلالة إحصائية بين الأبعاد الثلاثة (السلطوية
القيادة والقيادة الخيرة والقيادة الفاضلة) للمتغير المستقل
(القيادة الأبوية) كمتغيرات مستقلة والأبعاد الثلاثة (الوقت ، التكلفة ،
الجودة) للمتغير التابع (إدارة المشاريع) كمتغيرات تابعة في العربي
مجموعة للتجارة والصناعة.
 نتائج الانحدار البسيط وتحليل الانحدار المتعدد التدريجي

The study aimed to evaluate the role of Paternalistic Leadership in managing projects as a “case
study” through questionnaires and testing of the main and sub-hypotheses. The study concluded
the following results:
 The correctness of the main hypothesis, as it was proven that there is a significant relationship
between Paternalistic Leadership and project management in El-Araby Group Company for
Trade and Industry.
 The correctness of the nine sub-hypotheses that emanate from the main hypothesis, where it
was proven that there are significant relationships between the three dimensions (Authoritarian
Leadership, Benevolent Leadership, and Virtuous Leadership) of the independent variable
(Paternalistic Leadership) as independent variables and the three dimensions (time, cost,
quality) of the dependent variable (Project Management) as dependent variables at El-Araby
Group for Trade and Industry.
 The results of simple regression and the gradual multiple regression analysis of the dimensions
of Paternalistic Leadership on each of the dependent variable and its three dimensions proved
the following: - The results of simple regression are that: (Virtuous Leadership) is the most influential on the
dependent variable (Project Management), followed by (Authoritarian Leadership), and
finally (Benevolent Leadership). While the results of gradual multiple regression analysis are
that only the two dimensions (Authoritarian Leadership, Virtuous Leadership) are affecting
the dependent variable, while the dimension (Benevolent Leadership) does not affect the
dependent variable). - The results of simple regression are that: (Virtuous Leadership) is the most influential on the
dimension (time) of the dependent variable (Project Management), followed by (Benevolent
Leadership), and finally (Authoritarian Leadership). While the results of gradual multiple
regression analysis are that only the two dimensions (Benevolent leadership, Virtuous
Leadership) are affecting the dimension, while the dimension (Authoritarian Leadership) does
not affect the dimension (time) of the dependent variable. - The results of simple regression are that: (Virtuous Leadership) is the most influential on the
dimension (cost) of the dependent variable (Project Management), followed by (Authoritarian
Leadership), and finally (Benevolent Leadership). While the results of gradual multiple
regression analysis are that the three dimensions affect the dimension (cost) of the dependent
variable. - The results of simple regression are that: (Virtuous Leadership) is the most influential on the
dimension (quality) of the dependent variable (Project Management), followed by
(Authoritarian Leadership), and finally (Benevolent Leadership). While the results of gradual
multiple regression analysis are that the three dimensions affect the dimension (quality) of the
dependent variable.

صدر ايضا كقرص مدمج

النص بالعربية والملخص باللغة الإنجليزية والعربية.